Monday, September 6, 2010

No trees, no future

As towns and cities become wetter and warmer as a result of climate change, trees are increasingly important to the places where we live. With their numbers in decline, we need to act now to preserve adequate levels of tree coverage.

Trees in the city of London.
Trees in the city of London. Photo by Stephen McLaren.

Many of the large, mature canopy trees in our streets and parks are getting old and will need to be replaced soon. To do this effectively there are two challenges we need to overcome.

Trees are getting smaller

Large, mature trees bring more benefit than small ones as they provide more shade, better shelter and catch more rain in their leaf canopies.

Yet large trees are often unjustly perceived to cause a range of problems – from subsidence to blocking out the light – and there is a growing tendency in urban areas to cut mature trees cut down and replace them with smaller, ornamental varieties.

New developments threaten trees

Trees are usually one of the last things that developers think about. By the time they are considered it is often too late to retain any existing mature trees or create an environment suitable for planting new species of large tree.

New trees also take much longer than most development cycles to grow, so even where long term plans are in place there is no guarantee that the planted trees with reach full maturity.

So, what’s the solution?

If we don’t think now about planting new trees now, our towns and cities could become very grey and inhospitable places in the future. These resources can help:

No Trees, No Future

Picture
 A TDAG report, supported by verified research, explains why trees are so important to our well-being and to the future of our towns and cities and gives advice to ensure that trees are allowed to thrive while development takes place. It explains why it is vital that we protect and plant larger varieties of trees. It demonstrates that by incorporating trees into new development the financial, social and environmental value of the resulting place can be greatly increased.

This report should be of particular use to developers, builders, planners and architects. It aims to
provide clear guidance, without an overwhelming amount of technical arboricultural detail.

Download your free copy here

no_trees_no_future.pdf
File Size: 1313 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File





    Knowing History, Serving It: Ashoka's Theory of Change

    Ashoka's job is to make Everyone a Changemaker™. To help create a world where everyone has the freedom, confidence, and skills to turn challenges into solutions. This allows each person the fullest, richest life. And a society so constituted will evolve and adapt faster and more surely than any other: Each person, rather better than the body's white blood "attack" cells, courses though society spotting challenges and then conceiving and putting in place the next, better step.

    Ashoka's own community of changemakers has the opportunity to make a very big difference — and therefore the responsibility to do our best — in advancing this goal. We have this opportunity for several reasons:

    1. Ashoka understands and serves a historical process, the transformation of the citizen half of the world's operations from a pre-modern to the same entrepreneurial and competitive architecture that has driven business ahead over the last three centuries. Such fundamental structural change is historically extremely rare.

    2. Ashoka is an association of a large share of the world's leading social entrepreneurs. Its values and culture are sharply, deeply, and strictly focused on serving this core membership. No one knows them, their needs, their life cycle, their very distinctive perspectives and ways of thinking, their values, and their dreams as well. Moreover, Ashoka is uniquely positioned to see both the individual pieces and the emerging patterns created by this "client base" across the world.

    3. Ashoka has been deeply engaged in learning from and learning to serve both this historical process and its leading social entrepreneur constituents across the globe throughout the last quarter century. These years have been the years when the citizen sector, led by its entrepreneurial cutting edge, "tipped" irreversibly onto its new competitive path and entered a period of rapid catch-up productivity acceleration and growth. Ashoka now has a rich pipeline of proven, high leverage interventions ready to spread globally and an institution that spots needs and then builds and adapts quickly.

    4. As the field matures, Ashoka is no longer alone. It has a growing number of partners and potential partners.

    Ashoka is enormously strengthened by the flow of both ideas and practical collaborations from these partners — from our decade old colleagueship with Avina/Nueva in Latin America to the month old alliance between changemakers.net and The Skoll Foundation's "Social Edge". Ashoka has helped about fifty groups learn as much as possible from its venture methodology and then get started providing analogous services to one group or another. Its new "strategic diamond" organizational focal points are specifically designed to weave whatever strengths exist in the areas where Ashoka is working together with its own and its Fellows' programs in order to maximize the synergies among all these pieces.

    Ashoka's core strategy is to find and drive home the highest leverage, most important interventions appropriate to each historical stage that will (1) advance social entrepreneurs and social entrepreneurship and (2) speed the transformation of the citizen sector and, more importantly, enable it to crystallize in the wisest possible ways.

    Ashoka is an entrepreneurial institution serving entrepreneurs. Its opportunities require strongly intrapreneurial leadership. It must therefore be an integrated/decentralized institution staffed by collegial/intrapreneurial people.

    Ashoka's first contribution was to create the functional equivalent of the venture programs that help top businesses take off. Helping one of the world's leading social entrepreneurs have the freedom and key supports necessary to fly is very probably the world's most highly leveraged, highest impact investment:
    • It launches a big idea that over time is likely to change its field on a continental scale.
    • It launches the social entrepreneur into a lifetime of high impact, independent changemaking.
    • It helps create the institutions needed to support both.
    • Its intervention comes at the moment when a little help means the world.
    • Each successful social entrepreneur and idea becomes a highly contagious (because enormously empowering) role model that encourages hundreds of others to care and to take social initiative.
    • Such social entrepreneurs are the cutting edge of the democratic revolution — citizens exercising power in society by organizing ideas and others.
    • Leading social entrepreneurs launch key pattern changes that ripple across applications and geography (every bit as much as major scientific break-throughs) — opening opportunities for myriad local changemakers. The growth of social entrepreneurship spurs the growth of the broader citizen sector, which in turn helps today's entrepreneurs and helps create more tomorrow.
    • Over its first decade Ashoka often said: "There is nothing more powerful than a big pattern-changing idea if it is in the hands of a first class entrepreneur."
    • Then Ashoka learned there is something that is more powerful — a community of leading social entrepreneurs working together.
    • As the field has evolved, the Ashoka team has developed new programs fitted to the needs of each phase. Each possible program must meet two tests before Ashoka will commit to it:
    • Will it make a major difference to the development of social entrepreneurship and of the competitive citizen sector globally?
    • Can Ashoka make it happen? Do we clearly see the "jujitsu" leverage points that will allow us to replace today's seemingly granite wall of current practice with a vigorously self-multiplying new pattern?

    Ashoka encourages (e.g., through its Global Collaborations challenge) Fellows, staff, and others in its community to propose and begin to test possible programs. Many of today's key programs started this way. However, as the ideas progress towards large scale, Ashoka applies these two tests ever more tightly.

    The table that follows provides sketches of several phases in the evolution of our field (our "market") and provides examples of Ashoka responses.

    Ashoka's interventions take place on three different but interconnecting planes:

    1. It launches and provides full life cycle support for individual top tier social innovations, entrepreneurs, and their institutions: stipends, community, and specialized inputs from strategic partners in management, communications, law, technology and finance.

    2. It is building patterns, frameworks, supports, and institutions that allow the members of the community to have impacts far greater together than they could apart. Two examples: (1) the mosaic initiatives, which allow leading social entrepreneurs working on the same broad issue to share ideas, select those that are the most universally useful, and work as a team to spread them and tip their field globally, and (2) collaborations across the profession to address its greatest common strategic needs e.g., encouraging many more people to join our new and mushrooming field.

    3. It is helping to build key elements of the field's long term architecture — e.g., the creation of much-needed new financial service institutions to serve the sector.

    Often interventions are important on several levels. The mosaic initiatives, for example, greatly enrich individual Fellows who can complement the principles and approaches they developed with those created by the rest of the field. Second, by working together to articulate and then market these principles, they can affect the lives of far more people far more deeply than they could working alone. Moreover, by helping one another and then collaborating to market their joint product, the intensity and value of the fellowship or community will grow sharply. Third, after several such powerfully successful experiences, the field will know long into the future both the great value of and how to organize such mosaic initiatives wherever a new issue comes into focus. The field will have gained the capacity to engage in group entrepreneurship — probably the most important shared capacity this field can have.

    In the 1980s, Ashoka developed and then, over four years, went to global scale with its first major contribution or "product": launching and helping leading social entrepreneurs and their ideas succeed. This remains a cornerstone contribution, and we believe it always will be because the need for social entrepreneurship will only increase with time.

    In the 1990s, Ashoka's market matured rapidly creating multiple and strongly interdependent new needs. The membership, which we individually and collectively exist to serve, then insistently drew us in to deal with these new needs and opportunities.

    We have developed, by and large tested and refined, and now are ready to move quickly to implement these new programs. We are now entering our second period of rapid growth.

    This second cycle is significantly different from the first. It involves more elements. Much of the power comes from the synergy among them. Many elements focus more on systemic change than direct service to individual entrepreneurs. This cycle is more complex and variable. Moreover, because the field is moving faster at this more mature stage, we have less time.

    This next stage in the field's evolution requires new institutions. Much of Ashoka's work product in this new cycle is new processes and institutions.

    Success also requires Ashoka to evolve significantly. A few examples:

    • Each program (e.g., every mosaic initiative, stimulating a new social financial services sector, or the fieldýs Academy) must have a dedicated, powerful global intrapreneur to succeed. Ashoka, therefore, must look increasingly like a flat professional firm with a growing number of "partner" intrapreneurs, supported by high quality "junior partners" and "associates."
    • Leadership must come very significantly from Ashoka's leading social (and business) entrepreneur core membership. These members and Ashoka staff should be largely interchangeable, both in terms of initiating and running projects and, as much as possible, in terms of careers. Another reason staff must be "collegial intrapreneurs."
    • All these intrapreneur-led global programs must be melded with one another and with the increasingly rich body of institutions the citizen sector is developing regionally. Ashoka's new cross-cutting practice groups will help with the first part of this challenge.

    Far more important are Ashokaýs four main "strategic diamond" teams. They are comprised of Ashoka's front line staff and other active members of its community in the four regions with 85 percent of the worldýs citizen sector activity. While Ashoka will provide appropriate lesser levels of service elsewhere, it will focus its implementation and integration efforts in these four areas. Each of these four teams (and their leaders) have three performance goals/measures for the next five years: (1) contributing importantly to building as strong and wisely designed a citizen sector in their diamond as possible; (2) maximizing service to Ashokaýs core top business and social entrepreneur members; and (3) building a brilliant team. To succeed, they must mesh all the program ingredients available into a carefully phased, maximally mutually reinforcing action program. Getting the relationship right between these diamond teams and the global cross-cutting program intrapreneurs is critical.

    Not every intrapreneurial initiative will fully succeed. There are too many variables, ranging from intrapreneurial skill to the occasional perfect storm in the surrounding environment.

    However, Ashoka's overall program, even if it seems ambitious, is very, very likely to succeed. In addition to the factors listed on page one, Ashoka's design is robust:

    • Intrapreneurs and entrepreneurs intervene at any decision point headed in the wrong direction. They are also the ultimate realists and change their ideas whenever needed to succeed.
    • Parallel programs and redundancy provide further strong insurance. Ashoka has, for example, a dozen programs designed in whole or part to shift the citizen sector onto a path of re-engagement with business. If eight or ten pass the "jujitsu" point of take off, we will probably achieve our purpose. We plan for only one-third of the promising mosaic initiative programs that win small early stage investments to make it to the expensive marketing stage. And, even if several that do enter the marketing phase only have modest impact, the others that fully succeed will be sufficient to provide the energy needed to give our field the capacity for group entrepreneurship. Another example: Changemakers and the mosaic initiatives are both designed independently to tease out and develop the universally empowering principles embedded in the entrepreneurs' practice. If both work, they feed one another. If one fails in one area or even overall, the work still goes ahead.
    • Ashoka encourages and helps other institutions to join the work.

    To succeed, Ashoka must be a special community. One that understands its rapidly evolving market. One that is entirely open to its members/clients and their ideas. One that is as rigorous and tough-minded as it is open and creative. One that is as intrapreneurial as its members/clients are entrepreneurial. One that is, therefore, constantly experimenting and learning and improving. One whose intrapreneurs see and care as much about the whole as they do about their piece — and who will, accordingly, weave the pieces together to great mutual and overall benefit. One where the internal spirit mirrors the quality of the global community it serves and is helping to build.

    Ashoka the organization must provide the value-based home, the framework and supports, and the discipline necessary for such a community to grow and flourish. Doing so is our biggest challenge.

    Bill Drayton, Chair 


    http://www.ashoka.org/node/986

    The Entrepreneur's Revolution and You

    What is a Social Entrepreneur?

    Social entrepreneurs are individuals with innovative solutions to society’s most pressing social problems. They are ambitious and persistent, tackling major social issues and offering new ideas for wide-scale change.
    Rather than leaving societal needs to the government or business sectors, social entrepreneurs find what is not working and solve the problem by changing the system, spreading the solution, and persuading entire societies to take new leaps.
    Social entrepreneurs often seem to be possessed by their ideas, committing their lives to changing the direction of their field. They are both visionaries and ultimate realists, concerned with the practical implementation of their vision above all else.
    Each social entrepreneur presents ideas that are user-friendly, understandable, ethical, and engage widespread support in order to maximize the number of local people that will stand up, seize their idea, and implement with it. In other words, every leading social entrepreneur is a mass recruiter of local changemakers—a role model proving that citizens who channel their passion into action can do almost anything.
    Over the past two decades, the citizen sector has discovered what the business sector learned long ago: There is nothing as powerful as a new idea in the hands of a first-class entrepreneur.

    Why "Social" Entrepreneur?

    Just as entrepreneurs change the face of business, social entrepreneurs act as the change agents for society, seizing opportunities others miss and improving systems, inventing new approaches, and creating solutions to change society for the better. While a business entrepreneur might create entirely new industries, a social entrepreneur comes up with new solutions to social problems and then implements them on a large scale.

    Historical Examples of Leading Social Entrepreneurs:

    • Susan B. Anthony (U.S.): Fought for Women's Rights in the United States, including the right to control property and helped spearhead adoption of the 19th amendment.
    • Vinoba Bhave (India): Founder and leader of the Land Gift Movement, he caused the redistribution of more than 7,000,000 acres of land to aid India's untouchables and landless.
    • Dr. Maria Montessori (Italy): Developed the Montessori approach to early childhood education.
    • Florence Nightingale (U.K.): Founder of modern nursing, she established the first school for nurses and fought to improve hospital conditions.
    • Margaret Sanger (U.S.): Founder of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, she led the movement for family planning efforts around the world.
    • John Muir (U.S.): Naturalist and conservationist, he established the National Park System and helped found The Sierra Club.
    • Jean Monnet (France): Responsible for the reconstruction of the French economy following World War II, including the establishment of the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC). The ECSC and the European Common Market were direct precursors of the European Union.
    To read more about social entrepreneurship, click here.

    The Entrepreneur's Revolution and You

    August 2, 2000

    The most powerful force in the world is a pattern-changing big idea - if it is in the hands of an entrepreneur of equivalent ambition.

    Each such major pattern shift triggers cascades of follow-on innovations, adaptations, and local applications. The railroad and today's digital revolutions are prime business examples.

    "Social entrepreneurship has multiplied, competition has arrived, and the sector is racing to catch up. Building the new institutions needed to support these historical forces is, of course, Ashoka's purpose. "
    This is just as true in the social arena. Florence Nightingale redefined her field every bit as much as Andrew Carnegie did his.

    Whether or not society generates a vigorous flow of these critical major innovations depends on its ability to foster and support the entrepreneurs. The economic success that has transformed the world over the last several centuries has ultimately been rooted in society's learning, first, how to tolerate business entrepreneurs and, then, how to support and reward them generously and at every step.

    Social entrepreneurs have not been so fortunate. Probably because they made governments nervous, they long experienced more persecution than assistance. Florence Nightingale was an exception.

    The direct result has been the notorious squalor of the social sector. Inadequate innovation - especially when compared to the steadily compounding productivity gains achieved by an entrepreneurial and competitive business world - has left social organizations sclerotic, service quality poor, costs high, salaries low, and repute lower still.

    The last two decades have seen an extraordinary historical turning point, the breakout of the social sector from this squalor. Across most of the world, the logjam suddenly broke. Social entrepreneurship has multiplied, competition has arrived, and the sector is racing to catch up. Building the new institutions needed to support these historical forces is, of course, Ashoka's purpose.

    In country after country the number of citizen organizations is up a hundred, even a thousand-fold. Tiny Slovakia went from a handful in 1989 to over 10,000 last year. According to the overall economy of the countries studied by the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project, "the nonprofit sector outpaced the overall growth of employmentý by nearly 2.5 to 1."¹ According to the conservative estimate of the Yearbook of International Organizations, the number of international citizen sector organizations (defined as groups with operations in more than one country) has reached more than 26,000 today, up from 6,000 in 1990. The magazine World Watch provides corollary data on the number of citizen sector groups operating at a national or local level. Approximately 1 million such organizations work in India. Of the approximately 2 million citizen sector organizations working in the United States, 70 percent of them were established in the last 30 years. Eastern Europe has seen well over 100,000 organizations established in the seven years following the fall of the Berlin Wall.²

    With learning and maturity, the average size, skill level, and competitive sharpness of these organizations has also increased. They are, moreover, becoming far more than the sum of their parts: We are seeing the emergence of the same sort of open, competitive-yet-collaborative relationships that marked the birth of the modern competitive business sector three centuries ago.

    This revolution in the organization of human society has gone little noticed. Even though extraordinarily rapid in historical terms, its pace does not fit the shutter speed of either the press or political cycle.
    "Because leading social entrepreneurs dealing with the sort of truly major pattern changes that Ashoka seeks out are grappling with historical forces that span the globe, social entrepreneurship is the first profession being organized at the global level."
    Nonetheless, when the history of these times is written, no other change will compete with it in importance. This sort of fundamental transformation in how society organizes itself is a tectonic shift far greater than the railroad or the creation of the nursing profession. This change is, moreover, essential to human evolution and survival: It opens the way for us to adapt far more quickly and with self-preservative balance to the social and environmental challenges our business success has unleashed.

    The job of the pattern-change social entrepreneur is to recognize whenever a part of society is stuck in an inefficient or harmful pattern, to conceive a better and safe alternative, to make that vision realistic and then a refined reality, and then to persuade his or her entire society to make the leap to this new way.

    Spotting and solving these problems requires the entrepreneur because only (s)he is married to a vision and cannot rest until it has transformed all of society. No other type has this inner need. Scholars and artists come to rest when they express an idea. Professionals when they solve a client's problem. Managers when they have enabled their organization to succeed.

    This need makes the entrepreneur persist for years and decades thorough all these steps and despite the resistance of myriad inertial forces that would frustrate others. They instinctively reject solutions that depend on local circumstances that would not work universally. Every day they are listening carefully and realistically for problems and openings. If something doesn't work, it is gone. The idea is constantly evolving and strengthening.

    The entrepreneur goes after what is stuck. It could be society's failure to deal effectively with corruption. Or prohibitively expensive rural electrification arrangements. Or land ownership laws that make it virtually impossible for people to work together in a multiple use forest environment. Or trade unions stuck in the heavy industry era that have not evolved to serve the growing portion of today's work force that is mobile. Or. . . . The needs are endless, and they will only grow as change accelerates.

    Ashoka: Innovators for the Public is the world's association of leading social entrepreneurs. That is to say, social entrepreneurs introducing changes that will significantly change the pattern in their field (e.g., young people or the environment or human rights) across a giant country (e.g., India or Brazil) or a multinational region of equivalent size.

    Ashoka's most important job is to help our rapidly emerging field develop the institutions and patterns that will enable it to contribute as powerfully as possible, that will allow all of us in the profession to collaborate, to help one another, to be far more than the sum of our parts.

    Because leading social entrepreneurs dealing with the sort of truly major pattern changes that Ashoka seeks out are grappling with historical forces that span the globe, social entrepreneurship is the first profession being organized at the global level. This is a challenge that requires constant vigilance lest we slip into narrower, most commonly national, lines of thinking.

    Ashoka is the field's first professional association. It, for example, has launched an initiative designed to help the citizen sector learn that it can and must build its own broad base of grassroots support (money, time, and information). Otherwise over-reliance on a few foundations and government will lead to both inadequate support and co-option. Ashoka is also working to define and encourage the development of new forms of financing for the sector that could serve the many needs that foundations and government find difficult to reach.

    Ashoka is also building new patterns of collaboration among Fellows working on the same issue globally, e.g., the over 300 Fellows working with young people or the 143 Fellows bringing innovation to health. Each has a powerful but partial answer. Only by bringing all these ideas together can one see the few universal principles that could help anyone wrestling with the issue. There simply are too few trees in any one country to see the forest.

    Over the next year Ashoka will launch a global Academy for the field's most successful practitioners. It will also experiment with the first firm for practitioners (analogous to the first law or consulting firm) that will allow members to benefit from the sort of economies of reputation, recruitment, common services, cross-fertilization, and colleagueship that the older professions have long enjoyed.

    Over the last two decades Ashoka, acting as the field's first venture support group (analogous to the venture capital firms of business), has helped launch over 1,000 important new social change ideas, the long careers of the social entrepreneurs behind them, and the institutions needed to support both. This critical service, which is what Ashoka is best known for and most experienced in providing, will continue as long as there is a need for social change.

    Each such entrepreneur and idea that succeeds, moreover, encourages many others to care for society's wellbeing and to champion changes they feel are needed. The multiplication of such decentralized concern and effective action is, of course, the essence of the democratic revolution.

    - William Drayton



    Saturday, September 4, 2010

    NEF Publications

    A selection of publications from our partners at the New Economics Foundation of London:

    The Great Transition

    Creating a new kind of economy is crucial if we want to tackle climate change and avoid the mounting social problems associated with the rise of economic inequality. The Great Transition provides the first comprehensive blueprint for building an economy based on stability, sustainability and equality.


    21 hours


    A ‘normal’ working week of 21 hours could help to address a range of urgent, interlinked problems: overwork, unemployment, over-consumption, high carbon emissions, low well-being, entrenched inequalities, and the lack of time to live sustainably, to care for each other, and simply to enjoy life.



    Growth isn't Possible


    Four years on from nef's Growth isn’t Working, this new report goes one step further and tests that thesis in detail in the context of climate change and energy. It argues that indefinite global economic growth is unsustainable. Just as the laws of thermodynamics constrain the maximum efficiency of a heat engine, economic growth is constrained by the finite nature of our planet’s natural resources (biocapacity).



    The Happy Planet Index


    The Happy Planet Index provides a new compass to set society on the path to real progress by measuring what truly matters to us - living a long and happy life - and what matters to the planet - our rate of resource consumption.




    The Consumption Explosion


    Overconsumption, not overpopulation, is the real threat to the environment. Even the recession has had little impact on our burgeoning ecological debt.

    Friday, September 3, 2010

    Blue planet or green globe?

    Inspirational examples of how villages, towns and cities around the world are becoming greener and cleaner.

    Singapore. Photo by William Cho.

    Singapore has a strategy to diversify and secure its limited water supply. Photo by William Cho.
    Community groups, planners and politicians across the world face strikingly similar environmental challenges.
    These include many problems that we are familiar with, such as managing sustainable urban growth, making the best use of scarce resources and adapting to climate change.

    World-class examples

    These international examples show how different places are dealing with their problems in their own unique ways:

    Earth Charter Music Album

    ECI Secretariat and composer Enrique Rodriguez-Pastor are pleased to present Life Alert, a new music album inspired by the Earth Charter. This collaborative project, which has been developed over the past year and a half, was created to provide a useful resource to educators of primary schools who are interested in working with values and principles of sustainability in the classroom.

    Language teachers of English and Spanish can also make good use of this resource. Playful and full of youthful energy, this album is geared toward children ages 5 – 12, yet it can be enjoyed by all ages. Founded on optimism, the songs (which vary from punk rock and hip hop to reggae and experimental) strike a unique balance between seriousness and silliness.

    Enrique Rodriguez-Pastor (aka Quique), the composer and musician, is an educator who was raised in both Peru and the United States. Faced with the challenge of finding himself in the midst of two distinct cultures while growing up, Quique learned what it means to embrace different cultural traditions as well as to find our common values. Along the way he also discovered one of humanity's universal vehicles for human expression – music. Two years ago, Quique stumbled upon something new altogether, something that affirmed his values in an inspiring way – the Earth Charter. Life Alert is the outcome of that inspiring encounter.

    And he felt quite happy on the day of the album’s completion...





    As an artist and educator, Quique created these songs with teachers in mind, as they often need materials that will help them get the attention of children and teenagers in order for them to learn about sustainable lifestyles.

    Find Life Alert songs and lyrics here



    This resource is offered as a gift especially to educators who are interested in teaching about sustainability using the Earth Charter principles.  It can also be used by anyone else free of charge!


    Wednesday, September 1, 2010

    The Ten Habits of Highly Effective Planners

    Richard C. Bernhardt, “The Ten Habits of Highly Effective Planners,” in Bruce W. McClendon and Anthony James Catanese, Planners on Planning (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc. 1996), pp. 37-52.

    1. Credibility – To Care is to Build Trust:  it is said that people do not care how much you know until they know how much you care.
    2. Listening – To Listen is to Learn: planning is the art of the political. Planning is not black or white, but rather shades of gray. The planner must listen and more important, understand to be effective.
    3. Research – To Research is to Supplement, not Supplant: there is never enough time to do all the research. Planners must balance the information available to do the job at hand.
    4. Thinking – To Process Information Successfully is to find Solutions: more than professionals in other fields, planners must usually color outside the lines, seek innovative solutions, and find new approaches to problems. Think horizontally – think beyond the obvious and understand the interrelatedness of ideas.
    5. Commitment – To Be Efficient, Planners Must Be Committed – Not every issue is worth fighting about, recognize the risks and strategically utilize your positions to bring issues forth that are important to the community
    6. Continuing Education – To Grow Is Constantly to Seek Education: Reading journals, publications. Conferences and other formal educational opportunities; experiencing other communities.
    7. Decision-Making – To Build Communities Requires Making Choices: communities often avoid tough decisions, making them takes political will; decisions must be based on a vision of what the community and society eventually can become; great communities are created through many small, deliberate individual decisions.
    8. Implementation – To Implement a Proposal Is to Show You Care – People care more about how a plan will improve their community and their lives than they do about the plan itself.
    9. Empowerment – To Transfer Responsibility Is to Build Community:  a solid partnership must be developed that begins at  project conception and continues through project completion; empowerment means that Planners Must Let Go
    10. Responsibility – To Build Community Requires Community Responsibility: the planner may be able to bring certain resources to the problem, but without community responsibility, no amount of government involvement will bring success.‬

    Mexico Climate Action Plan

    Mexico City is demonstrating environmental leadership that can be adopted by other megacities around the world.


    Residents and visitors alike can enjoy the many benefits of Mexico City’s progressive Green Plan. The sweeping 15-year plan will transform the city through strategies and actions that foster sustainable development and reduce the risks and effects associated with climate change. The plan encompasses a wide range of programs and activities to address climate change, reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and encourage businesses and citizens to adopt climate-friendly behavior.

    The comprehensive Green Plan addresses seven separate pillars: habitability and public space, land conservation, water supply, transportation and mobility, waste and recycling, air pollution, and energy and a climate action program. The environmental initiatives will help Mexico City accomplish its ambitious goal to reduce carbon emissions by 7 million tons (12 percent) between 2008 and 2012.

    Nearly 20 city agencies are working together to make the $1 billion-per-year investment in green living a reality in the urban environment. The Green Plan is a key priority of the Mexico City government and represents about 7 percent of Mexico City’s total yearly budget.
    The plan has won accolades around the globe, including the support of former U.S. President Bill Clinton. In fact, the Clinton Global Initiative has pledged $200 million to helping Mexico City meet its goal of cutting greenhouse gas emissions. Mexico City’s Metrobus project, a bus rapid transit (BRT) system, won the 2009 Roy Family Award for Environmental Partnerships by the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University.

    Mexico City’s commitment to a more sustainable future is also represented by its active involvement in the C40 – Cities Leadership Group, a group of major world cities promoting action and cooperation on reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

    With more than half of the world’s population living in urban areas for the first time in history, urban centers such as Mexico City are on the front-line of global climate change. Mexico City is demonstrating environmental leadership that can be adopted by other megacities around the world.

    HafenCity: A Case Study on Future-Adaptive Urban Development

    Cities need to plan for the future now by developing infrastructure and communities that make them resilient, rugged and adaptable to planetary changes. Coastal cities are particularly vulnerable to increased flooding from larger storm surges and sea level rise. And, as Bruce Stutz noted last year, "adapting to this reality has become a key part of future planning for London, Rotterdam, St. Petersburg, Tokyo, and Seattle, as well as low-lying cities across Asia" and New York City. Here's another waterfront city that is taking future-adaptive urban planning seriously: HafenCity.

    HafenCity is marked by the red dot adjacent to Hamburg, Germany and along the river Elbe. | (Image captured with Bing Maps)
    HafenCity, or Harbor City, is a new city quarter under development in the old harbor of Hamburg, along the river Elbe. It is one of the largest inner-city rebuilding projects in Europe and has been in development for over ten years already, with completion expected around 2020-2030. I'm not breaking any news here, yet I somehow had not heard of this development until I read this recent interview with Kristina Hill in which she lays out three design strategies for responding to climate change - protect, renew, and re-tool - and says that the 'protect' category of adaptive action is exemplified by the HafenCity development:
    Hamburg...will allow flooding, but designed a major new part of the city to be resilient to high water, with water-proof parking garages, a network of emergency pedestrian walkways 20 feet above the street, and no residential units at ground level. Even the parks in this new Harbor City district are designed to withstand battering by waves and storm surge, either by floating as the waters rise, or by incorporating lots of hard surfaces that only need to be washed off when the waters recede.
    Intriguing! I immediately started scanning the Net to learn more. Since HafenCity is such a large and long standing development project - it features building, bridge, and landscape designs from over 700 architects, including powerhouse names like Rem Koolhaas, Herzog & de Meuron, and Behnisch - it was easy to find well illustrated articles that discuss the development's architectural projects and overall sustainability features, but coverage of its water adaptation design strategies, with illustrative images, was sparse. This post is an attempt to remedy that lack. By looking through the development's official website, scouring Flickr, and exploring a selection of the architecture, landscape architecture and engineering firms' websites, I think I've been able to pull together a serviceable attempt at a visual case study of HafenCity's future-adaptive urban design strategies.

    BASIC LAYOUT

    Physical model of HafenCity looking east, with the new buildings in the development modeled in a light wood tone. Hamburg proper is connected to HafenCity by bridges to the north, and is primarily modeled in white. The old harbor warehouse district, Speicherstadt, runs east to west between Hamburg and the new HafenCity development to the south, and is primarily modeled in the darker wood tones. The new iconic concert hall, Elbphilharmonie, is visible as a translucent form above a darker wood base on the far right, and at the end of the pier. | (Image courtesy of Flickr/m.prinkle)


    This diagram shows what parts of the HafenCity development have already been completed or are under construction, and which sites have been allocated or are ready for allocation. | (Image captured from page 2 of the PDF "HafenCity Hamburg Projects March 2010: Insights into Current Developments")


    A diagram of the districts in HafenCity. | (Image captured from page 7 of the PDF "HafenCity Hamburg Projects March 2010: Insights into Current Developments"; titles enlarged to be readable here)

    FLOOD PROTECTION >>> 5 Levels of Public Space
    HafenCity and Speicherstadt lie to the south of the main Hamburg dike and are therefore susceptible to flooding. Rather than build new dikes, the developers incorporated other flood resilient and adaptive infrastructure into the actual construction of the roads, buildings and public spaces with the intention of both controlling flood waters and providing residents with waterfront access:
    The intensive reciprocal interaction between land and water can be regarded as unique, for HafenCity will not be surrounded by dikes, nor cut off from the water. With the exception of the quays and promenades, the total area, i.e. streets, parks and development sites will be raised to 7.5 to 8 meters above sea level. This creates a new, characteristic topography, also maintaining access to the water and emphasizing its typical port atmosphere. ("HafenCity Hamburg Projects March 2010: Insights into Current Developments" [PDF], page 5)
    Essentially, HafenCity has five occupiable public levels:
    On the water: Floating docks are accessible at sea level, which changes twice daily:

    The pontoons of the Traditional Ship Harbor provide a...level of urban perception which rises and falls with the tide. Since the water level of the River Elbe varies twice daily by more than 3 meters, depending on the ebb and flow of the tide, perception of the quarter is constantly changing. The relationship here between water level, quay walls and edges, pontoons, watercraft and buildings is continuously shifting.

    This photo shows the Traditional Ship Harbor at Sandtorhafen. | (Photo: ELBE&FLUT; Source: HafenCity Hamburg GmbH)

    Waterfront Promenades: Embankment promenades for walking and cycling are at 4 to 5.5 meters above sea level.

    This photo shows a waterfront promenade in the Dalmannkai district. | (Photo: ELBE&FLUT; Source: HafenCity Hamburg GmbH)

    This photo shows a waterfront promenade and the Vasco da Gama Plaza in the Dalmannkai district. These pathways are popular routes for bikers and walkers, and bring people right to the waters edge. | (Photo: Daniel Barthmann; Source: HafenCity Hamburg GmbH)

    This photo shows a waterfront promenade in the Dalmannkai district with the higher street level and building plinths visible in the background. | (Photo: ELBE&FLUT; Source: HafenCity Hamburg GmbH)

    Terraces: The Magellan and Marco Polo Terraces provide the largest public squares in the city, and creatively transition the public thoroughfares from the waterfront promenades to the street level.

    Panorama of the Magellan Terraces. | (Photo by Roland Halbe; via Enric Miralles - Benedetta Tagliabue | EMBT Architects)

    Aerial view of the Marco Polo Terraces looking north. The terraces face west towards the evening sun and descend in gradual steps to the water. | (Photo: T. C. Kraus; Source: HafenCity Hamburg GmbH)

    Streets: All streets (and buildings) are built on artificially raised, flood-protected bases at around 7.5 to 8 meters above sea level.

    This photo of a promenade in Dalmannkai shows all levels of public space, from water, to waterfront, to street level; it is clear how much higher the street level is than even the waterfront. A section of the raised plinth on which the streets and buildings sit is visible as a decorated wall in the mid-ground of this photo. | (Photo: T. C. Kraus; Source: HafenCity Hamburg GmbH)

    The flood-protected base of the Headquarters of Germanischer Lloyd building, in the Brooktorhai district, stands out dramatically in the water. | (Image via gmp-architekten)

    Above the streets: In addition to the street level, there are higher elevations of occupiable space, some public and some private. A new public plaza is being built at 37 meters above sea level as part of the new Elbphilharmonie.

    This rendering shows the design of the new concert hall, Elbphilharmonie, with a public plaza occupying the space between the old Warehouse A structure and new glass building above. | (Rendering: © Herzog & de Meuron; via Elbphilharmonie website)

    The 'above the streets' level of the private realm is also characterized by residential units, which all start at one-story above street level.

    This photo shows residential units overhanging a waterfront promenade in Am Sandtorkai/Dalmannkai. The building plinth wall is visible on the left; street level and the first floor of the buildings start at the top of the white portion of the wall. Residential units begin one-story above street level, and here, appear over two-stories above the waterfront promenade. | (via Flickr/iPhotography)

    LEVEL CHANGES: Water-to-Street with Terraces, Old-to-New with Bridges and Stairs;
    Because HafenCity has so many different levels of public space there are many interesting points of interaction between levels. In HafenCity quarter proper, the terraces are the sites of the most dramatic places of transition. They link the waterfront to the streets above; stepping up from sea level (0 m), to promenade level (4.5 m) to street level (7.5 m).

    A view of the Magellan Terraces in Am Sandtorkai/Dalmannkai. | (Photo: ELBE&FLUT; Source: HafenCity Hamburg GmbH)

    Another dramatic point of level change occurs between the old historic district of Speicherstadt and HafenCity along Am Sandtorkai street. While all the streets in HafenCity that are south of Am Sandtorkai are raised at 7.5 to 8 meters above sea level, Am Sandtorkai remains at its historic level. In consequence, bridges and stairs are necessary to navigate these level changes.

    Photo shows the dramatic difference in street levels between Speicherstadt and HafenCity proper. | (via Flickr/madle-fotowelt.de)

    Birds eye photo looking west up Am Sandtorkai | (Photo via Bing Maps)


    These photos show the Am Sandtorkai street that runs between the old Speicherstadt district (right) and the new Am Sandtorkai district (left). The street itself is at the historic level of the Speicherstadt, but the new new buildings in Am Sandtorkai are elevated on flood-secure plinths. The top image shows the street in dry conditions and the lower image shows it in a flood. | (Top image captured from page 13 of the PDF "HafenCity Hamburg Projects March 2010: Insights into Current Developments." Lower image via HafenCity Hamburg; © ELBE&FLUT)

    Another photo of Am Sandtorkai street during a flood. The doors of the "flood gates" to the lower levels of the buildings, where much of the parking garages are located, are visible at the base of each building. | (via Miniatur Wunderland)

    The bridges and stairs along Kibbelstegbrucke are a particularly striking example of how Speicherstadt and HafenCity come together.

    Kibbelstegbrucke | (Birds eye photo from the east, looking west via Bing Maps)

    Bridge and stairs on Kibbelstegbrucke | (via Flickr/Eichental)

    The Kibbelsteg bridges are also an integral part of the safety infrastructure of HafenCity. As the bridge engineers note:
    In order to make the new areas of the HafenCity accessible to fire protection and first aid services, there is a need for a new network of pathways at 7.5 m above sea level. The Kibbelsteg bridges connect this network to the high tide protected areas of the inner city, crossing the Zollkanal, the Brooksfleet, and the “Am Sandtorkai“ street.

    Kibbelsteg Bridge | (Image captured from page 48 of the PDF "HafenCity Hamburg Projects March 2010: Insights into Current Developments")

    CONCLUSION
    HafenCity reveals one approach to tackling future-adaptive urban development. The raised roadways and buildings, water resilient surfaces, floating waterfront promenades, terraced landscapes and bridges all work together as important infrastructure and create an architecturally vibrant district that connects residents to the waterfront -- while also making the whole area resilient in the face of more frequent flooding.
    In addition to its water adaptive design strategies, HafenCity exemplifies many other sustainable urban planning ideas. It is dense, walkable, bikeable, served by public transit, and full of multi-use buildings and public spaces. Much of the land was formerly brownfields and has now been cleaned and developed. Additionally, the historic character of the area is honored: many buildings in the neighboring Speicherstadt area have been refurbished (see the International Maritime Museum for one example); and some buildings in HafenCity proper, like the new concert hall, adaptively reuse existing buildings.
    I'm very excited to learn more about this project and I'd welcome reader feedback from any of you who've visited (or even live there!). Is the project as great as it seems?
    Did anyone attend the recent "Watercities in Transition" conference where HafenCity was presented as an example of flood resistant urban design? Please let me know what you learned in the comments below!
    ...
    Note to local Seattlites: If you're interested in waterfront design, mark your calendars for Wednesday, September 15! The four shortlisted teams working on designs for reshaping Seattle's waterfront will present their designs to the public that evening from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. at Benaroya Hall.
    ...
    LINKS OF INTEREST
    Other 'sea-level rise' urban design projects:
    Selection of HafenCity websites:
    Architects, Landscape Architects, and Engineers of HafenCity:
    In case you missed them in the post above, here are most of the links I embedded in the text; in order of appearance:
    Related stories in the Worldchanging archives:
    • The Lessons of Katrina: Global Warming Adaptation is a Cruel Euphemism and Prevention is Far, Far Cheaper | Joe Romm, 31 Aug 09:
      If we won’t adapt to the realities of having one city below sea level in hurricane alley, what are the chances we are going to adapt to the realities of having all our great Gulf and Atlantic Coast cities at risk for the same fate as New Orleans — since sea level from climate change will ultimately put many cities, like Miami, below sea level? And just how do you adapt to sea levels rising 6 to 12 inches a decade for centuries, which is the fate we risk by 2100 if we don’t reverse greenhouse gas emissions trends soon. Climate change driven by humans GHGs is already happening much faster than past climate change from natural causes — and it is accelerating.
    • Seven Meters | Jamais Cascio, 22 Mar 06:
      Flood Maps mashes up NASA elevation data and Google Maps, and offers a visualization of the effects of a single meter increase all the way to a 14 meter rise. The default increase of seven meters -- about 23 feet for those who avoid the whole metric thing -- is the amount the world's oceans will rise once Greenland's glacial ice pack melts completely. This melting is already underway, and is happening with startling speed.
    • Information is Beautiful: When Sea Levels Attack | David McCandless / The Guardian, 23 Feb 10:
      ...in this diagram, I've tried to sum up all the current research on sea level rises. What will happen, when it will happen, and where the sea water is coming from.
    • Environmental Restoration in the Age of Climate Change | Alex Steffen, 31 Mar 06:
      If we're going to bring Puget Sound back to health, we need to bring those shorelines back to health. To do that, People for Puget Sound, the Nature Conservancy and Trust for Public Land have teamed up to announce the Alliance for Puget Sound Shorelines, an effort to raise $80 million over the next three years to "restore and protect Puget Sound's ecologically rich shorelines and ensure they're available for people to enjoy for generations to come." This is good work. The challenge, though, is that the shorelines themselves are becoming moving targets. Already, global warming is changing Puget Sound, causing the water to warm and the sea to rise. Predictions for the future are even more alarming. "Business-as-usual will yield warming of 6 to 9 degrees F by the end of the century and...sea level will rise. The last time it was 5 degrees F warmer than now sea level was at least 80 feet higher," says James Hansen, NASA's chief climate scientist. Other studies suggest that without drastic action, we may have already committed ourselves to as much as a twenty feet of sea-level rise. Studies suggest that melting ice sheets alone are already causing the sea to rise at about a millimeter a year.
    • Urban Resilience for Dummies, Part 2: Failing the Milk Test | Warren Karlenzig, 10 Mar 10:
      We can no longer manage and develop our communities with no regard for the limits of natural resources and ecological systems that provide our most basic needs. A shining alternative is metropolitan areas that have begun to plan for the future by building their resilience with economic, energy, and environmental uncertainty in mind: top U.S. metro locations include Portland, Oregon, Seattle, San Francisco, New York and Denver, and suburbs such as Davis, California and Alexandria, Virginia. These communities are employing some of the following key strategies that underpin resilient urbanism:
    • The Future of Cities and Transportation: Learning from the Parable of the Horse | Amanda Reed, 2 Aug 10:
      "Bus rapid transit systems and "complete streets" are great. But to design urban transportation systems that are truly sustainable, we have to think much further ahead." So writes Mathias Crawford at the beginning of his new post up at GOOD titled "The Future of Cities and Transportation," in which he explores how to plan future cities that both address current needs and are flexible enough to adapt to changing technologies and behaviors. As an example of the dilemma urban planners face, he shares the parable of the horse...


    Talks on TED: Johan Rockstrom and Nic Marks

    Statistician Nic Marks asks why we measure a nation's success by its productivity -- instead of by the happiness and well-being of its people. He introduces the Happy Planet Index, which tracks national well-being against resource use (because a happy life doesn't have to cost the earth). Which countries rank highest in the HPI? You might be surprised.




    Speakers Nic Marks: Happiness researcher

    Nic Marks gathers evidence about what makes us happy, and uses it to promote policy that puts the well-being of people and the planet first. He's the founder of the Centre for Well-Being at the UK think tank New Economics Foundation (NEF).
    Why you should listen to him:

    Nic Marks thinks quality of life is measurable, and that true contentment comes not from the accumulation of material wealth but from our connections with others, engagement with the world, and a sense of autonomy. This isn't just theory: a pioneer in the field of well-being research, Marks creates statistical methods to measure happiness, analyzing and interpreting the evidence so that it can be applied to such policy fields as education, sustainable development, healthcare, and economics.

    The founder of the Centre for Well-Being, an independent think tank at the New Economics Foundation (NEF), in London, Marks is particularly keen to promote a balance between sustainable development and quality of life. To investigate this, he devised the Happy Planet Index, a global index of human well-being and environmental impact. The results made headlines: People in the world's wealthiest countries, who consume the most of the planet's resources, don't come out on top in terms of well-being. Which raises the question: What purpose does unfettered economic growth serve?

    To measure (and possibly improve) your own HPI, visit two useful sites from NEF: 5 Ways to Well-Being and Well-Being at Work.

    "Marks urged politicians to pay more attention to life satisfaction over GDP. 'The big message of [the HPI] rankings is that we have to produce a system that makes people happier without costing the Earth,' he said."

    Louise Gray, Telegraph

    Johan Rockstrom: Let the environment guide our development

    About this talk

    Human growth has strained the Earth's resources, but as Johan Rockstrom reminds us, our advances also give us the science to recognize this and change behavior. His research has found nine "planetary boundaries" that can guide us in protecting our planet's many overlapping ecosystems.



    Speakers Johan Rockstrom: Sustainability expert

    If Earth is a self-regulating system, it's clear that human activity is capable of disrupting it. Johan Rockstrom has led a team of scientists to define the nine Earth systems that need to be kept within bounds for Earth to keep itself in balance.
    Why you should listen to him:

    Johan Rockstrom is a leader of a new approach to sustainability: planetary boundaries. Working with a team of 29 leading scientists across disciplines, Rockstrom and the Stockholm Resilience Centre identified nine key Earth processes or systems -- and marked the upper limit beyond which each system could touch off a major system crash. Climate change is certainly in the mix -- but so are other human-made threats such as ocean acidification, loss of biodiversity, chemical pollution.

    Rockstrom teaches natural resource management at Stockholm University, and is the Executive Director of the Stockholm Environment Institute and the Stockholm Resilience Centre. He's a leading voice on global water, studying strategies to build resilience in water-scarce regions of the world. Fokus magazine named him "Swede of the Year" in 2009 for his work on bridging the science of climate change to policy and society.

    "Rockstrom has managed in an easy, yet always scientifically based way, to convey our dependence of the planet's resources, the risk of transgressing planetary boundaries and what changes are needed in order to allow humanity to continue to develop."
    Anna Ritter, Fokus magazine

    www.ted.com