Sunday, November 15, 2009

People First Economics


How can we rein in the beasts unleashed by the free market economy? Some of the world's greatest thinkers, writers and leaders propose the answers.



Toxic debt, rising job losses, collapsing commodity prices and expanding poverty. How can we rein in these beasts unleashed by the free market economy?

People First Economics takes a long, hard look at the mess globalized capitalism is in, and shifts the focus back to where it belongs – putting the needs of people and the environment first.

Vanessa Baird and David Ransom have gathered a passionate group of writers, activists, leaders and thinkers to seize this opportunity to replace deep-rooted problems with well-founded solutions.

People First Economics buzzes inspiration and action. Evo Morales promotes his 10 step programme to save the world, life and humanity... Michel Albert advocates a classless alternative to capitalism... Naomi Klein encourages public revolt...

It’s about radical changes that are social, moral and ecological it provides the opportunity to rethink what really matters in life.


I was pleased to be asked to write a chapter for the New Internationalist 'People First Economics' book. It's under the title 'Open Source Anti-Capitalism' arguing that commons, etc, provide an alternative to market based economics and top down socialism.

Commons is based on common pool property rights so it promotes equality and access to resources, that equals prosperity.

Access is based on the rule that resources are maintained in a sustainable way, this adds up to a built in ecological ethic.

Once the property rights that maintain access and ecology are established, people are free within these broad parameters to do their own stuff.

Commons was until last week ignored by the economics profession, Elinor Ostrom's Nobel win, has changed that.

Well if you believe in a top down paternalistic state that takes control or rule by corporations you will find Ostrom's work challenging....

My Chapter is inspired very much by Ostrom and Hugo Blanco, it's in a book full of essays on alternatives to the present failed economic model.

I am amazed to be in a book with such important thinkers and activists as Evo Morales and Naomi Klein.

There is book launch on 7th November in London, more details here.

Its not free but at £9.99 its pretty much a steal and of course you can order from the library which makes it commons.

If you want to buy it click here.


by Derek Wall 


Elinor Ostrom has transformed economics.




Derek Wall was the last Principal Male Speaker of the Green Party of England and Wales. "How to be green? Many people have asked us this important question. It's really very simple and requires no expert knowledge or complex skills. Here's the answer. Consume less. Share more. Enjoy life." Penny Kemp and Derek Wall This blog promotes anti-capitalism, green politics, direct action, practical lifestyle change, indigenous struggle, Venezuela/Cuba and a touch of Zen. Ecosocialism or muerte!



I was amazed to find that Elinor Ostrom, a 76-year-old professor, had won the Nobel Prize for economics.

While everyone else seemed to be asking: "Elinor who?" I was celebrating the fact that my favourite political economist had picked up the award.

Ostrom - Lin to her friends apparently - shares the prize with Professor Oliver Williamson.

While Williamson is not a radical thinker and uses elegant theory to defend corporations rather than a collective commonwealth, it is appropriate that Ostrom, who studies the economics of sharing, shared the prize.

Ostrom is reluctant to give opinions outside her academic field, but what an important field it is.

She deals with communal property rights, a topic which is taboo for mainstream economists but a necessity for readers of the Morning Star.

Ostrom has spent her working life carefully refuting what is known as the "tragedy of the commons."

This was the title of a 1968 paper by biologist Garrett Hardin, who argued that common property will inevitably be wrecked.

Hardin takes the example of a field used for grazing cattle. Without private ownership it will be impossible to prevent overgrazing and the commons will be destroyed, he claims.

What is needed is to privatise the field and then, with one owner, it will be fine.

Hardin also developed the "lifeboat" thesis, a fascist parable that is used to justify throwing people from the boat to keep it afloat.

Hardin's ideas, distasteful as they are, look like common sense and have been used to fuel the seizure of communally owned resources.

Either privatisation or an authoritarian state can protect resources. Communal ownership is impossible, according to Hardin.

Ostrom's magisterial book Governing The Commons examined why Hardin was wrong. She studied in detail examples of commons to see if they could be made to work.

Despite the economists' argument that human self-interest makes co-operation impossible, she found that, time after time, people got together, held meetings and democratically planned systems of rationing.

In fact, people-based commons are still the most widely practised form of property found in the world's rainforests - and they work.

Ostrom studied commons used by Swiss farmers, Japanese peasants, communal irrigation systems in Sri Lanka and fisheries around the globe.

Some commons worked better than others. Some fell apart. But the impossible as far as the economists were concerned - an alternative to the market - was possible.

Ostrom's work is important to socialists because it shows that it is possible to run economic systems without private property or state control.

Marx famously argued that socialism would lead to communism based on the commons, where democratic planning would put people in control.

Ostrom has shown that even in a capitalist society such commons can be made to work.

She maintains that, while human beings may be self-interested, they are not stupid and can co-operate when this creates long-term security and prosperity.

Ostrom argues that resources and ecosystems are generally better maintained by local communities than corporations or the state, although she is careful to note that small isn't always beautiful and sometimes other institutions are necessary.

Many socialists will find her scepticism about the state unpalatable. They should not.

Marxists recognise that property rights are key and that communism is about the introduction of communal property rights.

Ostrom and Marx repeat the same words. A panacea or utopia is impossible because a thinker cannot second guess the democratic creativity of citizens.

Ostrom's work has already been used widely. For example, Alaskan policy-makers have used her ideas to create a system of sharing oil revenues.

The Creative Commons movement on the internet and the economics of social sharing advocated by thinkers such as Richard Stallman and Yochai Benkler draw upon her work.

And visionary political leaders such as Hugo Chavez and Raul Castro have been putting her ideas of a grass roots, diverse and ecological commons into action.

Castro's land reform gives peasants land but rejects privatisation and encourages ecological use.

And Chavez's 21st century socialism based on communal councils is about taking power from the state and giving it to people.

In the Peruvian Amazon, the indigenous activists are using Ostrom's work to challenge plans to privatise their commons in the rainforests.

Marx, of course, discovered the commons before Ostrom and wrote about it often.

He noted that the commons in Britain had been stolen from peasants who were forced from the land to become industrial workers.

Virtually his first piece of political journalism On The Law Of The Theft From Woods dealt with the destruction of a common, where landowners made it illegal for peasants to pick up fallen wood for fuel.

In advocating the ecological commons, Marx noted: "Even an entire society, a nation, or all simultaneously existing societies taken together, are not the owners of the Earth.

"They are simply its possessors, its beneficiaries, and have to bequeath it in an improved state to succeeding generations asboni patres familias (good heads of the household)."

But perhaps Ostrom is a little more radical than Marx for her time frame.

When she won a politics prize last year, she stated: "I am deeply indebted to the indigenous peoples in the US who had an image of seven generations being the appropriate time to think about the future.

"I think we should all reinstate in our mind the seven-generation rule. When we make really major decisions, we should ask not only what will it do for me today, but what will it do for my children, my children's children and their children's children into the future."

I can't wait for her Nobel speech, Harold Pinter rocked us when he won his Nobel but Ostrom's will be the best. However modest women and careful researcher that she is, I know she will hate my praise.

 
 

Saturday, November 14, 2009

Charter for Compassion



A call to bring the world together…

The principle of compassion lies at the heart of all religious, ethical and spiritual traditions, calling us always to treat all others as we wish to be treated ourselves. Compassion impels us to work tirelessly to alleviate the suffering of our fellow creatures, to dethrone ourselves from the centre of our world and put another there, and to honour the inviolable sanctity of every single human being, treating everybody, without exception, with absolute justice, equity and respect.

It is also necessary in both public and private life to refrain consistently and empathically from inflicting pain. To act or speak violently out of spite, chauvinism, or self-interest, to impoverish, exploit or deny basic rights to anybody, and to incite hatred by denigrating others—even our enemies—is a denial of our common humanity. We acknowledge that we have failed to live compassionately and that some have even increased the sum of human misery in the name of religion.

We therefore call upon all men and women ~ to restore compassion to the centre of morality and religion ~ to return to the ancient principle that any interpretation of scripture that breeds violence, hatred or disdain is illegitimate ~ to ensure that youth are given accurate and respectful information about other traditions, religions and cultures ~ to encourage a positive appreciation of cultural and religious diversity ~ to cultivate an informed empathy with the suffering of all human beings—even those regarded as enemies.

We urgently need to make compassion a clear, luminous and dynamic force in our polarized world. Rooted in a principled determination to transcend selfishness, compassion can break down political, dogmatic, ideological and religious boundaries. Born of our deep interdependence, compassion is essential to human relationships and to a fulfilled humanity. It is the path to enlightenment, and indispensible to the creation of a just economy and a peaceful global community.

Charter for Compassion

10 Ways to Change Your Life


by


YES! Bicycle Man

poster-thumb
PDF icon11x17" 1.3mb

Download pdf
poster
of 10 Ways….




1-with-leaf.jpgEAT YOUR VEGETABLES

All you have to do is stop eating beef. Worldwide, beef production contributes more to climate change than the ­entire transportation sector. The carbon footprint of the average meat eater is about 1.5 tons of CO2 larger than that of a vegetarian. Cutting beef out of your diet will reduce your CO2 emissions by 2,400 pounds annually.

2-with-leaf.jpg

DRINK FROM THE TAP

You can save money and your environment by giving up bottled water. The production of plastic water bottles together with the privatization of our drinking water is an environmental and social catastrophe. Bottled water costs more per gallon than gasoline. The average American consumes 30 gallons of bottled water annually. Giving up one bottle of imported water means using up one less liter of fossil fuel and emitting 1.2 pounds less of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.

3-with-leaf.jpgOBSERVE AN ECO-SABBATH

For one day or afternoon or even one hour a week, don’t buy anything, don’t use any machines, don’t switch on anything electric, don’t cook, don’t answer your phone, and, in general, don’t use any resources. In other words, for this regular period, give yourself and the planet a break. Every hour per week that you live no impact cuts your carbon emissions by 0.6 percent annually. Commit to four hours per week, that’s 2.4 percent; do it for a whole day each week to cut your impact by 14.4 percent a year.

4-with-leaf.jpgTITHE A FIXED PERCENTAGE OF YOUR INCOME

Tithe a fixed percentage of your income to non-profits of your choice. If an average U.S. family contributes 1 percent ($502.33) of its annual income ($50,233) to an environmental non-profit, they could offset 40.7 tons of carbon dioxide per year. Many of our public health and welfare services are tied to consumer spending which, in turn, depends upon planetary resources. If you want to help, don’t go shopping. Just help.

5-with-leaf.jpgBUILD A COMMUNITY

Have dinners with friends. Play charades. Sing together. Enjoying each other costs the planet much less than enjoying its resources.



6-with-leaf.jpgGET THERE UNDER YOUR OWN STEAM

Get around by bike or by foot a certain number of days a month. Not only does this mean using less fossil fuel and creating less greenhouse gases, it means you’ll get exercise and we’ll all breathe fewer fumes. If you can stay off the road just two days a week, you’ll reduce greenhouse gas emissions by an average of 1,590 pounds per year.

7-with-leaf.jpgCOMMIT TO NOT WASTING

Wasting resources costs the planet and your wallet. Let your clothes hang-dry instead of using the dryer. Take half the trips but stay twice as long. Repair instead of rebuy. The list goes on. In the summer, for every degree above 72°F you set your thermostat, you save 120 pounds of CO2 emissions per year, and if you wash your clothes with cold water you can cut your laundry energy use by up to 90 percent.

8-with-leaf.jpgTAKE YOUR PRINCIPLES TO WORK

We must act as though we care about the world at work as much as we do at home. Company CEOs or product designers have the power to make a gigantic difference through their business, and so do the rest of us. In commercial buildings, lighting accounts for more than 40 percent of electrical energy use, a huge cause of greenhouse gas production. Using motion and occupancy sensors can cut this use by 10 percent.

9-with-leaf.jpgDONATE A DAY'S TV TIME TO ECO-SERVICE

Take one day off from TV—the average American watches four and a half hours of TV a day—and try voluntary eco-service instead. Those four and a half hours a day watching TV add up to 825 pounds of carbon dioxide each year.

10-with-leaf.jpgBELIEVE WITH ALL YOUR HEART THAT HOW YOU LIVE YOUR LIFE MAKES A DIFFERENCE

We are all interconnected. Every step toward living a conscious life provides support to everyone else who is trying to do the same thing—whether you’re aware of it or not. We are the masters of our destinies.


Colin Beavan adapted this piece for Climate Action, the Winter 2010 issue of YES! Magazine. Colin Beavan is founder of the No Impact Project, noimpactproject.org. His book No Impact Man was published in 2009 by Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.

Path to a Peace Economy


David Korten presented the following speech on October 19, 2009 during a keynote lecture at the Economics of Peace Conference in Sonoma, California. 

My subject tonight is the Path to a Peace Economy, based on ideas elaborated in my most recent book, Agenda for a New Economy, and the New Economy issue of YES! Magazine.
Wall St
I start with a basic truth. A persistent pattern of violence against people, community, and nature is inherent in the institutional structure of our existing economy.
You don’t treat a cancer with Band-Aids, and we can’t resolve our current economic crisis with marginal regulatory adjustments. It is time to rethink and restructure.

Systemic Failure

Our economic institutions have been designed by Wall Street interests to secure personal economic and political power in the hands of members of a small ruling elite. They do it well. Unfortunately, it is the wrong purpose. We need a top to bottom redesign to put in place the institutions of a new economic system, a New Peace Economy, designed to share power and resources in a world that works for all.
So how bad is the failure of our current system? It is public knowledge. A brief review, however, is in order.

Economic Collapse

The Wall Street financial collapse has stripped tens of millions of previously middle class Americans of their jobs, homes, and retirement assets and plunged them into poverty and despair. The federal government and the Federal Reserve have responded by pouring trillions of dollars into the Wall Street financial institutions that created the crisis with minimal conditions and oversight, all in the hope that some of this money would trickle down as loans to the productive economy. The recipient financial institutions used the money instead to fund acquisitions that make "too big to fail" banks even bigger, pay dividends to shareholders who by market rules should have been wiped out in bankruptcy proceedings, award obscene bonuses to criminally culpable executives, and launch new predatory financial scams that create new systemic risks.
Wall Street says we have now weathered the crisis, which basically means the profits and bonuses of its most rapacious financial institutions have been restored. The jobs, homes, and retirement assets of ordinary Americans have not. To the contrary, job losses, bankruptcies, and housing foreclosures continue.

Social Collapse

This, however, is only the tip of the iceberg. In the absence of progressive tax and public service policies, the institutions of the old economy create an ever-growing wealth gap between the profligate few and the desperate many. This obscene injustice is tearing apart the social fabric of family and community essential to a healthy society. The resulting fear, insecurity, and sense of injustice fuel the forces of violence as expressed in terrorism, genocide, political deadlock, and high rates of crime, incarceration, and suicide. All are both consequences and indicators of a failed economic system.

Environmental Collapse

Now we come to the system’s ultimate failure: environmental collapse. The rules and institutions of the Old Economy drive endless growth in wasteful and destructive forms of material consumption that deplete soil and water, disrupt climate patterns, and convert Earth’s natural capital into toxic garbage, thus reducing Earth’s capacity to support life, creating massive human displacement, and intensifying a violent competition for Earth’s remaining resources that finds expression in bloated military budgets and wars of occupation.
Start with virtually any dysfunction or injustice in our society and it traces back to a failed economic system. Follow the money, and it leads ultimately to Wall Street.

A Failed Experiment

For some thirty years, we have been engaged as a nation and as a species in a social engineering experiment to test the claims of an extremist economic ideology known as market fundamentalism.

Ideology of the Sociopath

You’ve heard the sermon preached by its most fanatic true believers:
"Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation and I care not who makes its laws."

-Mayer Amschel Rothschild,
founder of the Rothschild banking dynasty.
There is no public interest—only an aggregation of private interests, which are best served when we each pursue our individual greed in a marketplace unfettered by rules and other forms of government interference. Public assets must be privatized to increase their productivity and efficiency by selling them to the highest bidder. The faster we consume, the faster the economy grows and the wealthier we become as a rising tide lifts all boats. 
Inequality is essential to social order and prosperity. It provides us with wealthy investors able to bear the risks of investing in the creation of jobs and a working class motivated by economic insecurity to work hard at those jobs at a globally competitive wage. There is no alternative. If a few get rich, instead of condemning them out of envy—which is a mortal sin—celebrate their good fortune, because as the rich get richer, wealth trickles down and we all get richer. In America, anyone can succeed who applies himself. Failure is a sign of a flawed character.
Is this story familiar? It is no mystery why this economic theology leads to ruthless competition, obscene accumulation, and reckless consumption that destroys the environment and tears apart the social fabric. It embodies the moral philosophy of the sociopath.
It is now time to acknowledge the lessons of this disastrous experiment. Markets do have an essential role in a healthy economy, but market extremism does not. It turns out that markets do need rules, there is an essential role for government, we all have more when resources are shared, and Jesus and the other great religious teachers were right. We are members of a community and we all do better when we care for one another and act with mindful consideration of the needs of others.

Wall Street as Operating System

The institutions of the economy determine how, as a society, we allocate whatever resources are available to us. In an earlier time, we organized ourselves into clans and tribes in which we cared for one another and allocated resources to secure the well-being of all. Resource allocation decisions were local and relationships were mediated by bonds of mutual caring and security. Money in the earliest human societies was unknown.
In our current society, most relationships on which we depend for the basics of survival, including food, water, shelter, and health care, are mediated by money. This gives enormous power to those who control the creation and allocation of money. In our country, that would be Wall Street.
To use a computer analogy, the Wall Street financial system has become the operating system of the economy and the society. The values and priorities of Wall Street thus become the defining values and priorities of the larger society. Wall Street has one value—money—and one goal: to maximize financial returns to those who control the money system. Social or environmental consequences find no place in Wall Street decision making.

A Choice-Making Species

In a few minutes, I will take up the question of how we can change this. In the meantime, I want to put our situation in its deeper historical, evolutionary, and spiritual context.
For the past 5,000 years, we humans have been living in a cultural trance of our own making that alienates us from the land, our true nature, and our place in the cosmos.
So who are we humans? From where did we come? And for what purpose? Here is how I understand the big story based on the data of science, the wisdom of indigenous peoples, and the teachings of Jesus and other mystics.

Hundreds of thousands of years ago, the Great Integral Spirit that expresses itself through what we know as creation embarked on a bold and risky experiment in reflective consciousness: bringing forth a species able to step back and to reflect on creation in awe and wonder and to participate as a conscious co-creator in the continued creative unfolding. We humans are that species.
In the past 100 years, we humans have achieved technological mastery beyond the imagination of previous generations. Yet, lacking in the wisdom of place and community that is the heritage of indigenous peoples, the cultures we call mainstream have lost their way — forgetting what it means to be human and denying our connection to the web of planetary life.
Our reflective consciousness gives us the capacity to choose our future with conscious collective intent. It was a risky experiment, however, because the capacity for self-awareness gives us an ego that can run out of control if it forgets it exists only as part of a larger whole.
In our earliest days, we humans raised our children collectively in the clan, tribe, or village, initiating them to the ways of life and the need to care for our Earth Mother as she in turn cares for us.
Over millennia, as our human consciousness was awakening and our capacities for self-direction grew, we learned to communicate through speech, master fire, domesticate plants and animals, and construct houses of skins, wood, stone, and dried mud. We developed the arts of pottery, painting, weaving, and carving. We undertook vast continental and transcontinental migrations to populate the planet and adapted to vastly different physical topographies and climates. We created complex languages and social codes that allowed for life in larger communities.
Then, some 5,000 years ago, something began to go terribly wrong. We turned from the ways of Earth Community and embraced the ways of Empire. It was a time of separation and forgetting. Community, partnership, and the celebration of life gave way to individualism, domination, and violence.
The few expropriated the wealth of the many. The masculine drove out the feminine. We continued to worship the Sky Father, but turned against our Earth Mother.  We came to value the power to kill and destroy more highly than the ability to create and nurture life.
Conquest became the measure of greatness. Economies came to be based on servitude and eventually money became the prime arbiter of human relationships.
Consider the dynamics inherent in a dominator system. With a few on the top and the many on the bottom, everyone is placed in competition with everyone else for the favored positions and the bonds of caring and sharing are broken. The creative energy of the species is redirected from securing the well-being of the tribe to advancing the technological instruments of war and the social instruments of domination.
The winners expropriate the available resources to maintain the system of domination. Positions of power are too often claimed by the most ruthless and psychologically damaged members of society. And so it has been for 5,000 years
If this discussion of Empire sounds familiar, it is for good reason. The kings and emperors have been replaced by corporate CEOs and hedge fund managers, but we are still living in the Era of Empire—and the basic dynamics still hold.
In the past 100 years, we humans have achieved technological mastery beyond the imagination of previous generations. Yet, lacking in the wisdom of place and community that is the heritage of indigenous peoples, the cultures we call mainstream have lost their way — forgetting what it means to be human and denying our connection to the web of planetary life. The time has come to rediscover our humanity and bring ourselves back into balance with our living Earth Mother. Creation has presented us with our final examination to determine whether we are a species worthy of survival. We must not, need not, fail.

When Money Rules

At its core, our current economic crisis is a spiritual crisis framed by this well-known scriptural verse from the Sermon on the Mount:
No one can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon. Matthew 6:24.
Mammon refers to wealth as an object of worship; the worship of a false god; a form of demonic possession; an evil force in opposition to Life.
Our worship of Mammon is the consequence of an illusion: the illusion that money is wealth and that making money is synonymous with producing wealth. The truth, as Wall Street has so dramatically demonstrated, is very different. Money isn’t wealth, and it is quite easy to make lots of money without producing anything of value to the larger society.
Money, the most mysterious of human inventions, a magical number of no meaning or existence outside the human mind, has displaced life as our object of sacred veneration and become the ultimate arbiter of human priorities. Money determines the fate of nations and shapes the boom and bust cycles of economic life. It allows some to live in grand opulence in the midst of scarcity, while confining others to death by starvation in the midst of plenty.
French cafeThe Economics of Happiness
France hopes to take the lead in shifting emphasis "from a ‘production-oriented’ measurement system to one focused on the well-being of current and future generations.”
This is money as a system of power, a tyranny all the more complete because it is largely invisible to those it enslaves. To liberate ourselves from the tyranny, we must demystify money and recognize that it is a mere number created from nothing with a simple accounting entry when a bank issues a loan. As economist John Kenneth Galbraith once famously observed, the process by which money is created is “so simple it repels the mind.”
When you take out a loan from a bank, the bank opens an account in your name and enters the amount of the loan in its ledger. That becomes a liability on the bank’s accounts, offset by the corresponding asset of your promise to repay with interest. Two simple accounting entries, and money magically appears from nowhere. This simple fact makes banking a very profitable business and is the key to the ability of the institutions of Wall Street and its global counterparts to rule the world.
Mayer Amschel Rothschild, founder of the Rothschild banking dynasty, once famously said, "Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation and I care not who makes its laws."
That pretty well sums it up. In our current system, this control is centralized in and monopolized by Wall Street institutions that value only money and seek only private accumulation. From a societal perspective it is a devastatingly unwise and destructive arrangement.
Money, particularly money that is created out of nothing without any contribution to the creation of anything of corresponding value, is phantom wealth—it has no substance or intrinsic utility. Creating phantom wealth is a Wall Street specialty. They call it financial innovation. I call it theft.

A Real Wealth Economy

So what is real wealth? We might say it is anything that has a real intrinsic value: land, labor, knowledge, food, education.
Most valuable of all are those forms of wealth that are beyond price: Love, a healthy, happy child, a job that provides a sense of self-worth and contribution, membership in a strong caring community, a healthy vibrant natural environment, peace—none of which find any place on Wall Street balance sheets or in our calculations of GDP.
Pull back the curtain, as the financial crash has done, and the truth is revealed that Wall Street acquires its power by destroying real living wealth to create phantom financial wealth. Wall Street is more than immoral, it is an institutional manifestation of evil.
So what will the New Economy look like, and how will we achieve it?

Living Earth

We begin with a recognition that the old economy is based not only on the illusion that money is wealth, but as well the illusion that we live in a world of open frontiers with endless abundant resources free for the taking. We are only now as a species awakening to the reality that we are passengers on a living spaceship and must learn to live in balanced relationship with our local ecosystems everywhere, working with nature to reuse and recycle everything and to eliminate the release of any substance that nature cannot readily absorb and detoxify.
Spaceship Earth, our Birth Mother, is endowed with a wondrous self-managing, self-regulating life support system that has nourished us as a species through the years of our growing up. As a loving parent, she has absorbed the insults and injuries of our reckless adolescent behavior. Our numbers and the power of our technology, however, now exceed her capacity to absorb.

Defining Principles

We must now restructure our economic institutions to align with three foundational principles: Ecological balance. Shared prosperity. And living democracy. Let’s take them one by one.
  1. Ecological Balance: It's spaceship management 101. We must bring ourselves into balance with Earth’s life support system—the biosphere. This requires something you don’t normally hear mentioned at economics conferences. We need to reduce aggregate human consumption, global GDP, starting with the most profligate nations. I’ll say more about this later. Follow me closely here: We must simultaneously redesign our human economies to function everywhere as subsystems of the local ecosystems that comprise Earth’s biosphere. 
  2. Shared Prosperity:  As we act to reduce aggregate consumption, we need to recognize that Earth’s bounty is the shared birthright of all living beings and learn to share it equitably to the benefit of all. The potential benefits of sharing prosperity go far beyond securing our mutual survival. According to a massive body of public health research, people in societies in which wealth and work are equitably shared enjoy greater physical and emotional health, stronger families and communities, less violence, and healthier natural environments than people in more unequal societies. Societies that are more equal are also more democratic and more resilient in the face of crisis.
    This has important implications for those of us who live in the United States. UK social epidemiologist Richard Wilkinson observes that among the world’s 30 richest countries we in the United States are number one in many things, including homicide rates, teenage pregnancy rates, rates of imprisonment, and numerous other social dysfunctions. We are also number one in the size of the income gap between our richest and poorest members. This is not a coincidence.

    The reason is simple. Greater inequality means greater psychological and emotional stress and insecurity for everyone, including for those at the top. Great sharing means less stress and insecurity.
  3. Living Democracy means exactly what it says:  living democracy as a daily practice of civic engagement. In a living democracy, popular sovereignty is integral to the fabric of community life. Living democracies celebrate and affirm diversity within a framework of individual rights, community responsibility, and mutual accountability. Their political and economic institutions support local decision making within a framework of cooperation and mutually agreed rules.
Ecological Balance, Shared Prosperity, and Living Democracy: three foundational principles of the new living peace economies on which the human future depends.

A Familiar Alternative

According to a massive body of public health research, people in societies in which wealth and work are equitably shared enjoy greater physical and emotional health, stronger families and communities, less violence, and healthier natural environments than people in more unequal societies.
Those of us who came of age during the latter part of the twentieth century were taught that we are limited to a choice between two economic models: the model of Wall Street capitalism or the model of Soviet communism. We in the West chose Wall Street capitalism based on the false claim that capitalism is the natural champion of democracy and market choice. Now we see the reality that when Wall Street capitalism has its way, our political choices are limited to politicians who serve Wall Street interests and our market choices are limited to those that generate the greatest Wall Street profits.

Living Market Economies

We’re not supposed to notice that both capitalism and communism, as we have known them, are simply alternative models of elite rule.
We have another option that is rarely mentioned, a planetary system of local living market economies that distribute and root decision-making power everywhere in inclusive, democratic, place-based living Earth communities, much in the manner of healthy ecosystems.
Many of the features of this New Economy option are more familiar than we might at first realize. They bear substantial resemblance to the Main Street economies many of us knew as we were growing up in the 1950s, 60s, and 70s.

The America We Once Knew

Nebraska auction
People Power Brought the New Deal to Life Farmers, the elderly, and others hurt by the Great Depression applied the pressure that resulted in the New Deal's reforms.
Although we had not yet dealt as a nation with crucial issues of race, gender, and the environment, the market rules of that day protected the public interest as we then understood it. Strong labor unions secured worker rights and assured a living wage. Our middle class was the envy of the world.
Banks were local and strictly regulated. Anti-trust protected the public from the abuse of corporate monopoly power. Cities and towns had vibrant lively Main Street economies served by local independent businesses that were accountable to the community and honored community values. And imagine this: Many insurance companies, hospitals, and financial institutions were organized as nonprofit cooperatives accountable to their members.
Most manufacturing was domestic, much of our food production was local, and we had a positive trade balance. Few families needed more than one car and per capita energy use was modest by current standards. There was substantial non-market household production and the typical wage for one employed working person was adequate to support a family.

Wall Street Take-Over

From the late 70s onward, Wall Street market fundamentalists mobilized to roll back the rules to unleash a consolidation of corporate power and de-link it from public accountability. Their right-wing social-engineering experiment allowed Wall Street to colonize the Main Street economy, decimated the middle class, undermined democracy and sense of community, reduced our national happiness index, and brought financial, social, and environmental devastation wherever it has reached.
Markets can and do support individual liberty and the public interest, but only when they operate within a framework of appropriate market rules and are complemented and supported by strong, democratically elected governments that enforce these rules and assure the provision of essential public services and infrastructure.
Appropriate rules support local ownership, bar private monopolies except within a strong regulatory framework, secure cost internalization and balanced trade among communities and nations, and prohibit monopoly pricing, market manipulation, and financial speculation.
We hear frequent reference these days to a distinction between the Wall Street economy and the Main Street economy. The difference is crucial.
Wall Street is in the business of using money to make money for people who have money without the burden of producing anything of value in return. Wall Street creates money out of nothing, engages in predatory lending at exorbitant interest rates, and uses its control of money to hold the public purse hostage to its demands. It is best understood as a criminal syndicate engaged in counterfeiting, usury, tax evasion, fraud, and extortion rackets—and should be treated accordingly.

Liberating Main Street

The Main Street economy is comprised of local businesses and working people engaged in producing real goods and services to meet real needs and providing meaningful, secure, family wage employment for the people of their communities. It is the logical foundation on which to build a new real wealth economy of green jobs, responsible community-oriented businesses, and sound environmental practices. Although devastated by the predatory intrusions of Wall Street corporations, it is now in revival as communities all across the nation rally to declare their independence from Wall Street and rebuild the community-serving economies they once knew.

No Wall Too Tall

Bringing down Wall Street may seem a daunting challenge to some of you. To get ourselves in the right spirit, I want to share an inspirational song by Raffi that he recorded to celebrate the launch of Agenda for a New Economy at the Trinity Wall Street Episcopal Church last January. It’s called “No Wall Too Tall.” Get up and dance with me as you listen to the words.
How many of you here grew up on Raffi’s music or have children who did? Raffi is currently devoting his life to an initiative he calls Child Honoring based on the simple truth that a world that works for all the children will work for everyone.

A Three Part Strategy

So how can we bring down Wall Street’s imperial tyranny?
We the people, as global civil society, are engaging this challenge on three strategic fronts:
  1. We are changing the defining stories of the mainstream culture. It is a simple but rarely noted truth that every great transformational social movement begins with a conversation aimed at challenging a prevailing cultural story. The civil rights movement changed the story on race. The environmental movement changed the story about the human relationship to nature. The women’s movement changed the story on gender. Our current task is to change the prevailing stories about the nature of wealth, the purpose of the economy, and our human nature. YES! Magazine and my most recent book Agenda for a New Economy are useful tools for organizing the necessary conversations.
  2. We are creating a new economic reality from the bottom up as millions of people the world over are working to strengthen locally owned human-scale business and family farms, developing local financial institutions, reclaiming farm and forest lands, changing land use policies to concentrate population in compact communities that reduce automobile dependence, retrofitting their buildings for energy conservation, and otherwise moving toward local self reliance in food, energy, and other basic essentials. The Business Alliance for Local Living Economies (BALLE) is building a national support system for these initiatives.
  3. We are changing the rules: Current law and public policy largely favor the Wall Street economy to the exclusion of Main Street economy. We must work together to promote and support political action at local, national, and global levels to change the balance in the favor of Main Street.

A New Economy Agenda

I’m currently focusing my energy on the New Economy Working Group, a partnership between Institute for Policy Studies in Washington DC, YES! Magazine, the Business Alliance for Local Living Economies, and the PCDForum.  We are working to articulate a comprehensive New Economy agenda. Here are five essential elements:
1. Implement Living Wealth Indicators as the basis for evaluating economic performance: Because we get what we measure, we should measure what we want. We currently evaluate economic performance against GDP, which is an indicator of the rate at which the economy is extracting useful resources from nature, converting them to saleable products, and disposing of them as toxic waste into our air, water, and soils—all for the primary purpose of making rich people richer. And this is what we get.
Stock price indices, another favorite indicator, measure the rate at which people who own financial assets are increasing their economic advantage over everyone else.
Imagine how different things would be if we designed and managed the economy to maximize indicators of the health and vitality of our children, families, communities, and natural systems—while simultaneously reducing environmental burdens by redistributing available resources from destructive and non-essential uses to beneficial ones that improve the quality of life for everyone, create meaningful beneficial jobs, and heal the environment.
We can end war and convert to a peace economy; reorganize our infrastructure to eliminate automobile-dependence; curtail advertising and redirect those creative and media resources to education; end financial speculation and redirect investment to productive sustainable enterprises devoted to meeting community needs. This list is just a start. It is about setting sensible priorities.

2. Create a Real Wealth Money System:  Last night Don Shaffer spoke of redirecting the flow of money from global to local financial markets and moving from complex, opaque, anonymous, short-term financial relationships to direct, transparent, personal, and long-term financial relationships. This defines our charge for redesigning and restructuring our systems of money creation and allocation.
Our existing Wall Street financial system centralizes the power to create and allocate money in an interlinked institutional system of mega-banks, hedge funds, private equity funds, the Federal Reserve, and captive regulatory bodies operating in secret beyond public oversight and accountability that I earlier described as a criminal syndicate.
The goal is to shift the economic system’s defining value from money to life, its locus of economic decision making from global to local institutions, its favored dynamic from competition to cooperation, and its primary purpose from growing the individual financial fortunes of the few to building living community wealth to secure the health and well-being of everyone.
The Bush and Obama administrations both pumped literally trillions of dollars of bailout money into the corrupt Wall Street financial institutions responsible for the current economic mess. Note here the essential difference between the bailout money and the Obama stimulus money. Bailout money goes to Wall Street financial institutions in the hope that some of it will trickle down to Main Street in the form of loans. Stimulus money bypasses Wall Street and directly funds the creation of productive jobs to create beneficial goods, services, and public infrastructure projects.
So imagine that instead of a bailout for the corrupt banks that caused the crash, the government had taken them over, broken them up, and spun off the pieces as individual community-based financial institutions—community banks, savings and loans, and credit unions. Some might be organized as private for-profits. Others as nonprofits or cooperatives. Some might be owned by state or local governments. All would function as properly regulated, community accountable public utilities.
Now imagine that the trillions of dollars that went to bailing out Wall Street banks had instead been added to the stimulus package to directly help homeowners facing foreclosure, create new jobs, and to fund education, health care, and public infrastructure. Further, imagine that the recipients of the stimulus money then deposited a portion of it as savings in these community financial institutions to be continuously recycled as low interest or no interest loans to grow local businesses, expand home ownership, and finance public investment. How different things might now be.
Here is a really radical idea: Let’s federalize the Federal Reserve and make money supply management and banking oversight transparent and publicly accountable federal functions. Why should the federal government borrow and pay interest on money created with an accounting entry by private banks, thus condemning our children to perpetual debt slavery to private banks and foreign countries, when it is within the means of the government to make the accounting entry itself?
3. Share the Wealth: As noted earlier, we all do better when we share the wealth. So let’s do it with:
  • Income and employment policies that assure every person who needs employment access to employment that provides a living wage.
  • Progressive taxation and public services policies that continuously recycle wealth from those at the top who have more than they need to those at the bottom who have less than they need.
  • Land use and regional development policies that limit sprawl and support compact multi-strata development that prevents geographical division by class and race.
  • Ownership policies that eliminate the class divide between owners and workers by encouraging every owning person to do productive work and every working person to be an owner.
4. Favor Businesses Organized as Living Enterprises for which the primary business purpose is to serve the community and profit is a means, not an end. Cooperative, worker, and local public ownership models sensibly and appropriately link business interests to community interests. We can and should make them our favored enterprise models.
5. Change the Global Rules to Support Local Control and Regional Self-Reliance:  Current global economy rules and institutions that put the economic rights of global financiers and corporations ahead of the economic rights of ordinary people, place-based communities, and even nations. They have it backwards. The rules and institutions of living peace economies properly support democratic self-determination at local, regional, and national levels, keep trade fair and balanced, favor local over global businesses, and facilitate the sharing of information and beneficial technology.
The goal is to shift the economic system’s defining value from money to life, its locus of economic decision making from global to local institutions, its favored dynamic from competition to cooperation, and its primary purpose from growing the individual financial fortunes of the few to building living community wealth to secure the health and well-being of everyone. It is ours to so choose and create.

How to Engage

You will find further information on everything I’ve covered here in Agenda for a New Economy. Buy a copy, download a discussion guide from davidkorten.org, and organize a discussion group to engage your friends, colleagues, and neighbors in an exploration of the new economy alternatives.
People are always asking, “What else can I do?” I recommend YES! Magazine as the place to start. Each issue is filled with stories of possibility and ideas for action. Visit the “Path to a New Economy” section of the YES! website.
*****
Part of growing up human is putting aside the ways of our childhood to embrace the more inclusive values and responsibilities of adulthood. Our time has come to grow up as a species coming of age on a small planet. This is the larger challenge before us. In a very real sense, it is about growing up spiritually to recognize and accept our place within the larger scheme of creation.
As we engage this challenging work in its many dimensions, we must constantly remind ourselves that we are privileged to live at the most dangerous—but also the most exciting—moment of creative opportunity in the whole of the human experience. We have the power to turn this world around for the sake of ourselves, our children for generations to come, and the continued creative unfolding of life on Earth. We are the ones we’ve been waiting for. Thank you.

David Korten author picDavid Korten is co-founder and board chair of YES! Magazine. His most recent book is Agenda for a New Economy: From Phantom Wealth to Real Wealth. He presented this speech on October 19, 2009 during a keynote lecture at the Economics of Peace Conference in Sonoma, California.




Dr. Lyly Rojas teaches peace to business




Humanitarian Dr Lyly Rojas is teaching the culture of peace to business students at the University of Applied Sciences and Technology in Vienna, Austria. Her challenge to future business leaders is to make waves in the corporate world and drive a culture change.


In the current economic climate, her message to the business world is particularly poignant. “I don’t think of the financial recession as a financial crisis, but as a human crisis,” she states. Rojas explains “The current economic situation is a consequence of the way the business world has conducted itself; economic greed has eroded the quality of human life and unraveled many of society’s structures. Now is a transformational moment”.


Rojas understands firsthand the importance of a culture of peace. She was born amidst political turmoil in Nicaragua and their political views and economic conditions forced her parents to flee to the United States. Her childhood experiences greatly influenced the humanitarian direction of her life. Consequently, both the United Nations (UN) and the Vatican have used her as a consultant. Rojas also spent a harrowing time in Kosovo as a consultant for the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE).

Turning her attention to future business leaders, Rojas’ aim is to make peacemakers of her students by showing them alternatives to adopting the predatory and aggressive nature of the corporate environment. She maintains there is an alternative to the caveman mentality, to the bullying and domination that prevails to maximize profit and get ahead in the business world. Rojas is promoting a culture shift.


“We are in our minds, not in our hearts. We buy clothes made by Taiwanese slaves and chop down 2,000-year-old trees. We don’t need more knowledge about problems; we know how to solve them,” she explains. “What we need is encouragement that we will prosper without greed.”


She gives her students the example of how child slavery relates to the business world; she tells them about the dresses that child slaves make in a far off land and companies sell for €4,000. In response, her students’ develop projects to change this. “Can you imagine how this makes me feel?” she asks excitedly. “Students come from different countries. Some are children of politicians and will have influence when they return home.”


Whatever the background and nationality, Rojas explains that students need to learn to get along with each other and deal with conflict in a constructive manner. She provides them with the tools to realize this through assigned tasks; case studies, cross-cultural simulation and group projects, some based on her time with the UN. “Some students refuse to work together because of nationality; men team up against women and some students from former dictatorships ask ‘can’t we bribe people?’. The experience is about finding a collaborative point,” she reveals.


Rojas’ teaching method is a holistic one; she wants to see a shift in her students from the automatic, impersonal “I’m a business person” to “I’m an ethical, thinking, feeling person who conducts business”, an ability to know themselves in order to be better leaders. She says: “I hope the feedback is ‘we are better at conducting business and we are better humans all around’.”


posted by Amanda_TWW on 11/ 2/2009 4:45 pm | COMMENTS (2)



Comments (2)

The topic which Dr. Lily taught to the students is appropriate nowadays. If we observe around us, there is already less peace. It's a very good idea that there are still people who are concerned of teaching peace to others. Anyway, in connection with the peace topic, our country wouldn't have peace unless we are suffering from crisis so maybe the first thing we must do is to solve this problem in order to attain peace. We are aware of course of the crisis happening around us and to worsen it there goes also the climate change, but of course all of these have solution. If you need a small loan to float you until payday, and can't get the help from a bank because of bad credit, you could look into short term loans for bad credit. Like any other financial tool, you have to be cautious and responsible with short term loans for bad credit, as it isn't free money. However, if you're looking for just some emergency money to take care of an unexpected expense, that's exactly what they are for. If you need the help quickly, plenty of lenders can take applications over the internet or phone, with no credit checks, and no faxing needed. It can be easy to get short term loans for bad credit, but you must be responsible.

posted by xavier12345 on 11/ 4/2009 3:23 am


Thank you very much for posting this article. I have recently been dedicating my efforts to bring about peace at my work environment, and would love to share my story which illustrates how difficult that process can be. It's been an up-hill battle at great personal cost and a fantastic story of how an underdog can make a huge positive impact in the work place. My story continues to unfold today and I strongly believe that my experience can be used as a business case study and would love to discuss the details with Dr. Rojas.

My conclusion so far; inner-peace must be the foundation upon which positive change in the work place can flourish. Be the change you want to see in the world, make that your mantra and watch the miracle unfold.

Namaste

Cyril Moré

posted by Cyril on 11/12/2009 6:32 pm

We will not die quietly


From: Teresa Niño - 350.org, organizers@350.org

Dear Friends,
Since October 24, when you helped lead thousands of events around the world calling for climate action, we've seen new political momentum behind the climate solutions that science demands.  After meeting with dozens of delegates during the last round of UN climate negotations in Barcelona, I can tell you first-hand that your local climate leadership is making a real difference--and helping clear the political space for national leaders to take ever-bolder stances on the climate crisis.

Earlier this week, President Nasheed--the leader of a low-lying nation faced with the very real threat of imminent extinction due to rising seas--delivered a powerful speech at the opening of the "Climate Vulnerable Forum."  In his speech, he calls for a survival pact in a plea so eloquent that you need to read it for yourself and sign the survival pact today.
The "Climate Vulnerable Forum" included many of the nations on the very front lines of the climate crisis, nations that are grappling with the impacts of the climate crisis here and now.
The focus of President Nasheed's speech was to bring attention to the dire consequences of ending the Copenhagen Climate Talks this December with a weak or non-binding agreement.

I'll let President Nasheed's words speak for themselves:
Address by His Excellency President Nasheed at the Climate Vulnerable Forum 

Your Excellencies, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen,


We gather in this hall today, as some of the most climate-vulnerable nations on Earth.


We are vulnerable because climate change threatens to hit us first; and hit us hardest.


And we are vulnerable because we have modest means with which to protect ourselves from the coming disaster.


We are a diverse group of countries.


But we share one common enemy.


For us, climate change is no distant or abstract threat; but a clear and present danger to our survival.


Climate change is melting the glaciers in Nepal.


It is causing flooding in Bangladesh.


It threatens to submerge the Maldives and Kiribati.


And in recent weeks, it has furthered drought in Tanzania, and typhoons in the Philippines.
We are the frontline states in the climate change battle.


Ladies and gentlemen,


Developing nations did not cause the climate crisis.


We are not responsible for the hundreds of years of carbon emissions, which are cooking the planet.


But the dangers climate change poses to our countries, means that this crisis can no longer be considered somebody else’s problem.


Carbon knows no boundaries.


Whether we like it or not, we are all in this fight together.


For all of us gathered here today, inaction is not an option.


So, what can we do about it?


To my mind, whatever course of action we take must be based on the latest advice of climate scientists. Not on the advice of politicians like us.


As Copenhagen looms, and negotiators frantically search for a solution, it is easy to think that climate change is like any other international issue.


It is easy to assume that it can be solved by a messy political compromise between powerful states.


But the fact of the matter is, we cannot negotiate with the laws of physics.


We cannot cut a deal with Mother Nature.


We have to learn to live within the fixed planetary boundaries that nature has set.


And it is increasingly clear that we are living way beyond those planetary means.


Scientists say that global carbon dioxide levels must be brought back down below 350 parts per million.


And we can see why.


We have already overshot the safe landing space.


In consequence the ice caps are melting.


The rainforests are threatened.


And the world’s coral reefs are in imminent danger.


Members of the G8 rich countries have pledged to halt temperature rises to two degrees Celsius.


Yet they have refused to commit to the carbon targets, which would deliver even this modest goal.


At two degrees we would lose the coral reefs.


At two degrees we would melt Greenland.


At two degrees my country would not survive.


As a president I cannot accept this.


As a person I cannot accept this.


I refuse to believe that it is too late, and that we cannot do any about it.


Copenhagen is our date with destiny.


Let us go there with a better plan.


Ladies and gentlemen,


When we look around the world today, there are few countries showing moral leadership on climate change.


There are plenty of politicians willing to point the finger of blame.


But there are few prepared to help solve a crisis that, left unchecked, will consume us all.
Few countries are willing to discuss the scale of emissions reductions required to save the planet.


And the offers of adaptation support for the most vulnerable nations are lamentable.


The sums of money on offer are so low, it is like arriving at a earthquake zone with a dustpan and brush.


We don’t want to appear ungrateful but the sums hardly address the scale of the challenge.


We are gathered here because we are the most vulnerable group of nations to climate change.


The problem is already on us, yet we have precious little with which to fight.


Some might prefer us to suffer in silence but today we have decided to speak.


And so I make this pledge today: we will not die quietly.


Ladies and gentlemen,


I believe in humanity.


I believe in human ingenuity.


I believe that with the right frame of mind, we can solve this crisis.


In the Maldives, we want to focus less on our plight; and more on our potential.


We want to do what is best for the planet.


And what is best for our economic self-interest.


This is why, earlier this year, we announced plans to become carbon neutral in ten years.
We will switch from oil to 100% renewable energy.


And we will offset aviation pollution, until a way can be found to decarbonise air transport too.


To my mind, countries that have the foresight to green their economies today, will be the winners of tomorrow.


They will be the winners of this century.


These pioneering countries will free themselves from the unpredictable price of foreign oil.
They will capitalize on the new, green economy of the future.


And they will enhance their moral standing, giving them greater political influence on the world stage.


Here in the Maldives we have relinquished our claim to high-carbon growth.


After all, it is not carbon we want, but development.


It is not coal we want, but electricity.


It is not oil we want, but transport.


Low-carbon technologies now exist, to deliver all the goods and services we need.
Let us make the goal of using them.


Ladies and gentlemen,


A group of vulnerable, developing countries committed to carbon neutral development would send a loud message to the outside world.


If vulnerable, developing countries make a commitment to carbon neutrality, those opposed to change have nowhere left to hide.


If those with the least start doing the most, what excuse can the rich have for continuing inaction?


We know this is not an easy step to take, and that there might be dangers along the way.


We want to shine a light, not loudly demand that others go first into the dark.


So today, we want to share with you our carbon neutral strategy.


And we want to ask you to consider carbon neutrality yourselves.


I think a bloc of carbon-neutral, developing nations could change the outcome of Copenhagen.


At the moment every country arrives at the negotiations seeking to keep their own emissions as high as possible.


They never make commitments, unless someone else does first.


This is the logic of the madhouse, a recipe for collective suicide.


We don’t want a global suicide pact.


And we will not sign a global suicide pact, in Copenhagen or anywhere.


So today, I invite some of the most vulnerable nations in the world, to join a global survival pact instead.


We are all in this as one.


We stand or fall together.


I hope you will join me in deciding to stand. 



Nasheed called on all nations to push for carbon neutrality in order to ensure the survival of his country and all the most vulnerable people around the world:
After all, it is not carbon we want, but development.  It is not coal we want, but electricity. It is not oil we want, but transport. Low-carbon technologies now exist, to deliver all the goods and services we need. Let us make the goal of using them.
Finally, he made the distinction between what might be considered a good deal in Copenhagen, and one that would ensure the end of his people:
At the moment every country arrives at the negotiations seeking to keep their own emissions as high as possible.  They never make commitments, unless someone else does first.

This is the logic of the madhouse, a recipe for collective suicide.

We don't want a global suicide pact.  And we will not sign a global suicide pact, in Copenhagen or anywhere.  So today, I invite some of the most vulnerable nations in the world, to join a global survival pact instead.
These are bold words, bolder than most people understand.

Here's the backstory:
President Nasheed and other leaders of some of the world's most vulnerable countries  are already being pressured to back down from their commitments to strong action. For example, when African countries stood up at the UN Climate Talks in Barcelona last week and demanded rich countries commit to strong climate targets, European capitol's placed immense pressure on them to back off, so much so that the chair of the African negotiating bloc was forced to leave the negotiations.

Leaders like Nasheed need our support. Your actions on October 24th opened the door for bolder leadership. And the deliveries of photos from Oct 24 events to over 110 countries in Barcelona (and cities all over the world) are helping turn grassroots action into political momentum.

Now, with just a month to go before Copenhagen, we must stand together.  All of us, from presidents and politicians to scientists and citizens, must seize this moment and take this movement for survival to the next level.
Teresa Niño and the 350.org Team
P.S. Please help increase the volume of this important call to action--share it with your friends on Facebook with literally two clicks.  Sharing the call on twitter is even easier--please take mere seconds out of your day to grow this movement.
P.P.S. We're still committed to offline, grassroots organizing, and we're gearing up for some historic events on the weekend of December 12th.  Plans are still evolving, but for now clear out that weekend--it's the midway point of the Copenhagen climate conference, and at that critical time we'll need all hands on deck to make this movement soar.
You should join us on Facebook by becoming a fan of our page at facebook.com/350org and follow us on twitter by visiting twitter.com/350

To join our list (maybe a friend forwarded you this e-mail) visit www.350.org/signup
350.org is an international grassroots campaign that aims to mobilize a global climate movement united by a common call to action. By spreading an understanding of the science and a shared vision for a fair policy, we will ensure that the world creates bold and equitable solutions to the climate crisis. 350.org is an independent and not-for-profit project.
What is 350? 350 is the number that leading scientists say is the safe upper limit for carbon dioxide in our atmosphere. Scientists measure carbon dioxide in "parts per million" (ppm), so 350ppm is the number humanity needs to get below as soon as possible to avoid runaway climate change. To get there, we need a different kind of PPM-a "people powered movement" that is made of of people like you in every corner of the planet.


Gabura – Daily Life and Disaster


In places like Gabura in south-west Bangladesh, climate change is costing lives – now, today.

Watch this documentary online:

In May this year an Oxfam team set out for the small rural community of Gabura in south west Bangladesh to address this question. But while setting out to film material for an online documentary – the first we had ever attempted – on climate change, Cyclone Aila hit the village with deadly ferocity. Rapidly, the story shifted to include not just the everyday effects of climate change, but to the devastating impact of a natural disaster.

Searching for higher ground after the cyclone in Gabura - image from Oxfam

Oxfam’s online documentary “Gabura – Daily Life and Disaster which captured these stories, starts with extraordinary footage of the cyclone hitting the village. It shows all too vividly the emotional and physical trauma endured by a community impacted by such events. And as director Sandhya Suri and colleagues gathered stories, both before and after the cyclone, it became apparent that in Gabura, as in so many other areas afflicted by climate change, it is often the women who are worst affected, who have the most heart-rending stories.

Sitting quietly in her home, Hosne Ara Khatun, a young woman with two children, was still so traumatised by the loss of her husband to a tiger attack she could barely speak. Eyeing the camera nervously, she related how he had gone in to the local forest to collect honey for the family. He never returned. Hosne now fishes daily with her two sons in order to find food to survive. If successful, they eat, if not, they go hungry. “So much hardship,” she whispers, her eyes darting to her children sadly.

Elsewhere in the community, Fatemah Khatun, a pretty young teenager, sits alongside her moths worrying she will not find a husband, as painful skin rashes caused by increasingly salty water – one of the more insidious effects of rising sea levels – have rendered her ‘unwanted’ by prospective husbands. Already, she says, her newly wed sister has been sent back home by her in-laws, displeased at the disfiguring marks that have blighted her young body.

While the dramatic cyclone footage provides a visceral experience to draw the audience in, it is these stories – the everyday traumas suffered by people living with the effects of climate change that linger longest in the mind. By making the documentary both online and interactive, so that the audience can choose the stories they wish to see, the audience can immerse itself in the experience of life in an area slowly succumbing to climate change’s impact, and in turn be galvanised into action in a bid to halt the devastation.

And as Oxfam and other organisations, activists, supporters and people across the globe await crucial climate talks in Copenhagen this December, we hope the stories of women such as Hosne and Fatemah are remembered.

Watch Oxfam’s online documentary “Gabura – Daily Life and Disaster

Article by Sarah Brown

Expedition to Antarctica


Hi, all,

Sorry to have been out of touch for so long.  For those I haven’t met, I took part in YES as a participant in July 2003 and in August 2004 as a facilitator.

I’m just about to embark on an expedition to Antarctica and am inviting you all to follow along and to perhaps join a future expedition.  Further details are here:

http://aaronholdway.wordpress.com/about/

The "Home" tab takes you to my blog on the expedition.  I’m taking questions on Antarctica and climate change and hope to engage as many people as possible, so please spread the word!

Hope to hear from you!

Aaron

Monday, November 9, 2009

Learn as You Go


Download pdf of discussion guide to print and distribute. 639k

null
null

Discussion Guide thumbYES! Discussion Guides are designed to help you explore your own experiences, opinions, and commitments as they relate to material found in YES! Magazine. Use them in group discussions, classrooms, or study circles. We believe that when people discuss critical issues of our time with mutual respect and caring, they create a powerful avenue for constructive social change.

You can find the Discussion Guide articles in the Fall 2009 issue of YES! Magazine, and coming soon on our website: see the table of contents for our Learn as You Go issue. You are welcome to photocopy the articles free of charge. If you would like to purchase multiple copies of YES! or subscriptions for your class or group, please phone 800/937-4451 and ask for the Discussion Group Discount.


Many of us are realizing that our education system is not preparing us or our kids to adapt to new realities, like a shrinking economy or climate change. This issue of YES! brings you an education in the things we need to create successful adults and kids: How do we learn to improve our communities, think critically, develop trusting relationships, and use our gifts to make societal contributions? No matter where you are in life, it’s never too late to learn.

This discussion guide will focus on the following articles:

  1. John Taylor Gatto, “Take Back Your Education”
  2. Julia Putnam, “A Lifelong Search for Real Education”
  3. Daniel Fireside, “Life’s Best Lessons are Outside the Classroom”
  4. Ron Miller, “Grounded Learning”
  5. Parker J. Palmer, “Know Yourself, Change Your World”


Take Back Your Education

Author John Taylor Gatto, a former New York State Teacher of the Year, invites you to reject schooling and reclaim education. Instead of salvaging a public school system that prioritizes obedience and “dumbed-down” curricula over a student’s self-discovery and personal strengths, Gatto says we need to return to a classical education in which independent thought trumps achievement tests. Today’s education objectives are failing our students, says Gatto, but we have the power to change the system.

  • Compare your education with the education you see students getting today. How has the education system changed? What do you think is missing from today’s education system?
  • Gatto says, “Nobody gives you an education. If you want one, you have to take it.” What have you done to claim your own path in education, either inside or outside of formal schooling? Have you had mentors who have influenced your life choices? Were you encouraged or discouraged from discovering your personal strengths and abilities in school?
  • How can we increase opportunities for self-discovery and mentorship in our schools?
  • What’s the appropriate role of testing in schools? Are grades a relevant way to measure student success? How might we evaluate kids on their creativity, critical thinking, and contributions to community, rather than just their test-taking skills? Should we separate grades and degrees from personal worth?

A Lifelong Search for Real Education

Julia Putnam describes how meeting education reformists Grace Lee and Jimmy Boggs turned her life around and signaled the start of her “real” education. Putnam became one of the first participants in the Boggs’ Detroit Summer program, a project to revitalize one of America’s most neglected communities. She realized that helping rebuild her city gave her life more direction than getting good grades—and trusting teens with hard work and tough challenges helps them learn the confidence and self-reliance to claim the lives they deserve.

  • When did your real education begin? Who shaped it? What did you learn?
  • Putnam writes that there are as many paths to success as there are children in a room. What was your unique path to success? What kinds of self-discoveries guided your personal journey?
  • Putnam says kids long to hear supportive messages: “Since we are all counting on you for our very existence, we need you to be your best self—to be healthy and kind and committed.” Think about the young people you know. How might you or your community build their confidence and help them understand the power they have to be their “best selves”?

Life’s Best Lessons are Outside the Classroom

In many schools, policies like No Child Left Behind place so much emphasis on test-taking drills that students have little time left over for hands-on learning. Daniel Fireside reports on a group of schools that are taking a different approach: They’re connecting children to their communities by giving them a stake in local interests such as food, neighborhood housing, and politics, and they’re raising test scores in the process. The schools are involved in place-based education, which engages kids in service and uses community members as mentors. Students not only learn about their local environments and neighborhoods; they actively seek solutions to the problems they encounter.

  • How important is it for schools to help students practice good citizenship?
  • What engaged you most as a student? Was it a school project, a special teacher, or an extracurricular activity, such as Boy Scouts, 4-H, or a music ensemble? How did the experience help you learn about your skills or your community?
  • What could you or your community do to supplement the education students get in school and to teach them about their local economy, politics, or natural resources? What steps might your community take to provide opportunities for students to engage in practical skills and critical thinking?

Grounded Learning

Teacher and author Ron Miller contends that our society needs a “great reskilling”—instead of preparing ourselves for careers in office cubicles, we need to learn to feed, clothe, and nourish ourselves using the resources of our local communities and bioregions. Miller is now educating himself this way, getting his hands in the dirt and teaching himself about permaculture. He says the Earth can no longer afford an education system that prepares us for an unsustainable, fossil-fuel-driven lifestyle.

  • Do you agree that a sustainable future will require us to retrain in practical, hands-on skills? What practical skills might you acquire? How would you learn them? How might such an education be rewarding?
  • What skills do you think your community will need to acquire to become more sustainable and adapt to a changing world and economy? How might our education system incorporate training in those skills?

Know Yourself, Change Your World

In an interview with executive editor Sarah van Gelder, educator and author Parker J. Palmer says that the key to a quality education and career is a better understanding of our inner lives. If people “mine their emotions for knowledge,” we can improve our sense of trust and make positive changes in society.

  • Have you encountered a situation at the workplace in which you witnessed or were asked to carry out unconscionable tasks, like the doctors Palmer mentions in the interview? What, if anything, did you do about it? How did it change your mind about the people you worked with or the environment you were in? How might our education system prepare us to make difficult moral decisions or question unethical practices in our institutions?
  • Does a larger mission guide your work and your choices? If not, how might you find that sense of moral purpose? How can you strengthen your contributions to that purpose?
  • Palmer quotes Socrates: “The unexamined life is not worth living.” Have there been pivotal events in your life that have caused you to reassess your place in the world or your quality of life? How did those events change your outlook or habits?
  • Many of the problems Americans face today—inadequate health care, recession, and environmental crises— stem from a lack of “moral agents.” How can we instill a sense of morality in the choices that governments, corporations, and everyday people make? How can we make this part of everyone’s basic professional training?
  • Palmer challenges us to stand and act in the “tragic gap,” reconciling the harsh realities we face with the great things we know are possible. What issues in our world require us take on that gap? And what possibilities for change might we be overlooking as a society? How can we encourage others to consider those possibilities?


What are you doing? How are you using this discussion guide? How could we improve it?

Please share your stories and suggestions with us at editors@yesmagazine.org with “Discussion Guide” as the subject.

YES! is published by the Positive Futures Network, an independent, nonprofit organization whose mission is to support people's active engagement in creating a more just, sustainable, and compassionate world.

  • www.yesmagazine.org
Learn as You Go
 

The Green Changemakers Copyright © 2008 Green Scrapbook Diary Designed by SimplyWP | Made free by Scrapbooking Software | Bloggerized by Ipiet Notez